Note: This document has been transformed into one-file HTML, but is copyrighted by the Parliament. Permission is awaiting approval from HMSO. Original document (many-file HTML format) is available on the Parliamentary web server.
House of Commons | Session 1999-2000 |
© Parliamentary copyright 2000. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office on behalf on Parliament. | Prepared 10 February 2000 |
House of Commons |
Session 1999-2000 |
Regulation of investigatory Powers Bill
| |
B I L L TO Make provision for and about the interception of communications, the acquisition and disclosure of data relating to communications, the carrying out of surveillance, the use of covert human intelligence sources and the acquisition of the means by which electronic data protected by encryption or passwords may be decrypted or accessed; to provide for the establishment of a tribunal with jurisdiction in relation to those matters, to entries on and interferences with property or with wireless telegraphy and to the carrying out of their functions by the Security Service, the Secret Intelligence Service and the Government Communications Headquarters; and for connected purposes. BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:- | |
PART I | |
COMMUNICATIONS | |
CHAPTER I | |
INTERCEPTION | |
Unlawful and authorised interception | |
Unlawful interception. | 1. - (1) It shall be an offence for a person intentionally and without lawful authority to intercept, at any place in the United Kingdom, any communication in the course of its transmission by means of- |
| |
| |
(2) It shall be an offence for a person- | |
| |
| |
to intercept, at any place in the United Kingdom, any communication in the course of its transmission by means of a private telecommunication system. | |
(3) Any interception of a communication which is carried out at any place in the United Kingdom by, or with the express or implied consent of, a person having the right to control the operation or the use of a private telecommunication system shall be actionable at the suit or instance of the sender or recipient, or intended recipient, of the communication if it is without lawful authority and is either- | |
| |
| |
(4) Where the United Kingdom is a party to an international agreement which- | |
| |
| |
| |
it shall be the duty of the Secretary of State to secure that no request for assistance in accordance with the agreement is made on behalf of a person in the United Kingdom to the competent authorities of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom except with lawful authority. | |
(5) Conduct has lawful authority for the purposes of this section if, and only if- | |
| |
| |
| |
and conduct (whether or not prohibited by this section) which has lawful authority for the purposes of this section by virtue of paragraph (a) or (b) shall also be taken to be lawful for all other purposes. | |
(6) The circumstances in which a person makes an interception of a communication in the course of its transmission by means of a private telecommunication system are such that his conduct is excluded from criminal liability under subsection (2) if- | |
| |
| |
(7) A person who is guilty of an offence under subsection (1) or (2) shall be liable- | |
| |
| |
(8) No proceedings for any offence which is an offence by virtue of this section shall be instituted- | |
| |
| |
Meaning and location of "interception" etc. | 2. - (1) In this Act- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(2) For the purposes of this Act, but subject to the following provisions of this section, a person intercepts a communication in the course of its transmission by means of a telecommunication system if, and only if, he- | |
| |
| |
| |
as to make some or all of the contents of the communication available, while being transmitted, to a person other than the sender or intended recipient of the communication. | |
(3) References in this Act to the interception of a communication do not include references to the interception of any communication broadcast for general reception. | |
(4) For the purposes of this Act the interception of a communication takes place in the United Kingdom if, and only if the modification, interference or monitoring or, in the case of a postal item, the interception is effected by conduct within the United Kingdom and the communication is either- | |
| |
| |
(5) References in this Act to the interception of a communication in the course of its transmission by means of a postal service or telecommunication system do not include references to- | |
| |
| |
(6) For the purposes of this section references to the modification of a telecommunication system include references to the attachment of any apparatus to, or other modification of or interference with- | |
| |
| |
(7) For the purposes of this section the times while a communication is being transmitted by means of a telecommunication system shall be taken to include any time when the system by means of which the communication is being, or has been, transmitted is used for storing it in a manner that enables the intended recipient to collect it or otherwise to have access to it. | |
(8) For the purposes of this section the cases in which any contents of a communication are to be taken to be made available to a person while being transmitted shall include any case in which any of the contents of the communication, while being transmitted, are diverted or recorded so as to be available to a person subsequently. | |
(9) References in this section to data being attached to a communication include references to the data and the communication being logically associated with each other. | |
(10) In this section "postal item" means any letter, postcard or other such thing in writing as may be used by the sender for imparting information to the recipient, or any packet or parcel. | |
Lawful interception without an interception warrant. | 3. - (1) Conduct by any person consisting in the interception of a communication is authorised by this section if the communication is one which, or which that person has reasonable grounds for believing, is both- |
| |
| |
(2) Conduct by any person consisting in the interception of a communication is authorised by this section if- | |
| |
| |
(3) Conduct consisting in the interception of a communication is authorised by this section if- | |
| |
| |
(4) Conduct by any person consisting in the interception of a communication in the course of its transmission by means of wireless telegraphy is authorised by this section if it takes place- | |
| |
| |
(5) Each of the following falls within this subsection- | |
| |
| |
| |
Power to provide for lawful interception. | 4. - (1) Conduct by any person ("the interceptor") consisting in the interception of a communication in the course of its transmission by means of a telecommunication system is authorised by this section if- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(2) Subject to subsection (3), the Secretary of State may by regulations authorise any such conduct described in the regulations as appears to him to constitute a legitimate practice reasonably required for the purpose, in connection with the carrying on of any business, of monitoring or keeping a record of- | |
| |
| |
(3) Nothing in any regulations under subsection (2) shall authorise the interception of any communication except in the course of its transmission using apparatus or services provided by or to the person carrying on the business for use wholly or partly in connection with that business. | |
(4) Conduct taking place in a prison is authorised by this section if it is conduct in exercise of any power conferred by or under any rules made under section 47 of the Prison Act 1952, section 39 of the Prisons (Scotland) Act 1989 or section 13 of the Prison Act (Northern Ireland) 1953 (prison rules). | |
(5) Conduct taking place in any hospital premises where high security psychiatric services are provided is authorised by this section if it is conduct in pursuance of, and in accordance with, any direction given under section 17 of the National Health Service Act 1977 (directions as to the carrying out of their functions by health bodies) to the body providing those services at those premises. | |
(6) In this section references to a business include references to any activities of a government department, of any public authority or of any person or office holder on whom functions are conferred by or under any enactment. | |
(7) In this section- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(8) In this section "prison" means- | |
| |
| |
and includes any contracted out prison, within the meaning of Part IV of the Criminal Justice Act 1991 or section 106(4) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, and any legalised police cells within the meaning of section 14 of the Prisons (Scotland) Act 1989. | |
Interception with a warrant. | 5. - (1) Subject to the following provisions of this Chapter, the Secretary of State may issue a warrant authorising or requiring the person to whom it is addressed, by any such conduct as may be described in the warrant, to secure any one or more of the following- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(2) The Secretary of State shall not issue an interception warrant unless he believes- | |
| |
| |
(3) Subject to the following provisions of this section, a warrant is necessary on grounds falling within this subsection if it is necessary- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(4) The matters to be taken into account in considering whether the requirements of subsection (2) are satisfied in the case of any warrant shall include whether the information which it is thought necessary to obtain under the warrant could reasonably be obtained by other means. | |
(5) A warrant shall not be considered necessary on the ground falling within subsection (3)(c) unless the information which it is thought necessary to obtain is information relating to the acts or intentions of persons outside the British Islands. | |
(6) The conduct authorised by an interception warrant shall be taken to include- | |
| |
| |
|
Interception warrants | |
Application for issue of an interception warrant. | 6. - (1) An interception warrant shall not be issued except on an application made by or on behalf of a person specified in subsection (2). |
(2) Those persons are- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(3) An application for the issue of an interception warrant shall not be made on behalf of a person specified in subsection (2) except by a person holding office under the Crown. | |
(4) The Secretary of State may by order remove any person from the list of persons for the time being specified in subsection (2). | |
Issue of warrants. | 7. - (1) An interception warrant shall not be issued except- |
| |
| |
(2) Those cases are- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(3) An interception warrant- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(4) The statements referred to in subsection (3)(b)(i) are- | |
| |
| |
(5) The statements referred to in subsection (3)(b)(ii) are- | |
| |
| |
Contents of warrants. | 8. - (1) An interception warrant must name or describe either- |
| |
| |
(2) The provisions of an interception warrant describing communications the interception of which is authorised or required by the warrant must comprise one or more schedules setting out the addresses, numbers, apparatus or other factors, or combination of factors, that are to be used for identifying communications which are likely to be or to include- | |
| |
| |
(3) Subsections (1) and (2) shall not apply to an interception warrant if- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(4) Conduct falls within this subsection if it consists in- | |
| |
| |
(5) A certificate for the purposes of subsection (3) shall not be issued except under the hand of the Secretary of State. | |
Duration, cancellation and renewal of warrants. | 9. - (1) An interception warrant- |
| |
| |
(2) An interception warrant shall not be renewed under subsection (1) unless the Secretary of State believes that the warrant continues to be necessary on grounds falling within section 5(3). | |
(3) The Secretary of State shall cancel an interception warrant if he is satisfied that the warrant is no longer necessary on grounds falling within section 5(3). | |
(4) The Secretary of State shall cancel an interception warrant if, at any time before the end of the relevant period, he is satisfied in a case in which- | |
| |
| |
that the person named or described in the warrant as the interception subject is in the United Kingdom. | |
(5) An instrument under the hand of a senior official that renews an interception warrant must contain- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(6) In this section "the relevant period"- | |
| |
| |
| |
Modification of warrants and certificates. | 10. - (1) The Secretary of State may at any time- |
| |
| |
(2) If at any time the Secretary of State considers that any factor set out in a schedule to an interception warrant is no longer relevant for identifying communications which, in the case of that warrant, are likely to be or to include communications falling within section 8(2)(a) or (b), it shall be his duty to modify the warrant by the deletion of that factor. | |
(3) If at any time the Secretary of State considers that the material certified by a section 8(3) certificate includes any material the examination of which is no longer necessary as mentioned in any of paragraphs (a) to (c) of section 5(3), he shall modify the certificate so as to exclude that material from the certified material. | |
(4) Subject to subsections (5) to (8), a warrant or certificate shall not be modified under this section except by an instrument under the hand of the Secretary of State or of a senior official. | |
(5) Unscheduled parts of an interception warrant shall not be modified under the hand of a senior official except in an urgent case in which- | |
| |
| |
(6) Subsection (4) shall not authorise the making under the hand of either- | |
| |
| |
of any modification of any scheduled parts of an interception warrant. | |
(7) A section 8(3) certificate shall not be modified under the hand of a senior official except in an urgent case in which- | |
| |
| |
(8) Where modifications in accordance with this subsection are expressly authorised by provision contained in the warrant, the scheduled parts of an interception warrant may, in an urgent case, be modified by an instrument under the hand of- | |
| |
| |
(9) Where- | |
| |
| |
that modification shall cease to have effect at the end of the fifth working day following the day of the instrument's issue. | |
(10) In this section references to scheduled parts of an interception warrant are references to provisions of the warrant which are contained in any schedule of identifying factors that is comprised in the warrant for the purposes of section 8(2), and references to unscheduled parts of an interception warrant shall be construed accordingly. |
Implementation of warrants. | 11. - (1) Effect may be given to an interception warrant either- |
| |
| |
(2) For the purpose of requiring any person to provide assistance in relation to an interception warrant the person to whom it is addressed may- | |
| |
| |
(3) The copy of an interception warrant that is served on any person under subsection (2) may, to the extent authorised- | |
| |
| |
omit any one or more of the schedules to the warrant. | |
(4) Where a copy of an interception warrant has been served by or on behalf of the person to whom it is addressed on- | |
| |
| |
| |
it shall (subject to subsection (5)) be the duty of that person to take all such steps for giving effect to the warrant as are notified to him by or on behalf of the person to whom the warrant is addressed. | |
(5) A person who is under a duty by virtue of subsection (4) to take steps for giving effect to a warrant shall not be required to take any steps which it is not reasonably practicable for him to take. | |
(6) For the purposes of subsection (5) the steps which it is reasonably practicable for a person to take in a case in which obligations have been imposed on him by or under section 12 shall include every step which it would have been reasonably practicable for him to take had he complied with all the obligations so imposed on him. | |
(7) A person who knowingly fails to comply with his duty under subsection (4) shall be guilty of an offence and liable- | |
| |
| |
(8) A person's duty under subsection (4) to take steps for giving effect to a warrant shall be enforceable by civil proceedings by the Secretary of State for an injunction, or for specific performance of a statutory duty under section 45 of the Court of Session Act 1988, or for any other appropriate relief. | |
(9) For the purposes of this Act the provision of assistance with giving effect to an interception warrant includes any disclosure to the person to whom the warrant is addressed, or to persons acting on his behalf, of intercepted material obtained by any interception authorised or required by the warrant, and of any related communications data. | |
Interception capability and costs | |
Maintenance of interception capability. | 12. - (1) The Secretary of State may by order provide for the imposition by him on persons who- |
| |
| |
of such obligations as it appears to him reasonable to impose for the purpose of securing that it is and remains practicable for requirements to provide assistance in relation to interception warrants to be imposed and complied with. | |
(2) The Secretary of State's power to impose the obligations provided for by an order under this section shall be exercisable by the giving, in accordance with the order, of a notice requiring the person who is to be subject to the obligations to take all such steps as may be specified or described in the notice. | |
(3) Subject to subsection (7), the only steps that may be specified or described in a notice given to a person under subsection (2) are steps appearing to the Secretary of State to be necessary for securing that that person has the practical capability of providing any assistance which he may be required to provide in relation to relevant interception warrants. | |
(4) It shall be the duty of a person to whom a notice is given under subsection (2) to comply with the notice; and that duty shall be enforceable by civil proceedings by the Secretary of State for an injunction, or for specific performance of a statutory duty under section 45 of the Court of Session Act 1988, or for any other appropriate relief. | |
(5) A notice for the purposes of subsection (2) must specify such period as appears to the Secretary of State to be reasonable as the period within which the steps specified or described in the notice are to be taken. | |
(6) Before making an order under this section the Secretary of State shall consult with- | |
| |
| |
| |
as he considers appropriate. | |
(7) For the purposes of this section the question whether a person has the practical capability of providing assistance in relation to relevant interception warrants shall include the question whether all such arrangements have been made as the Secretary of State considers necessary- | |
| |
| |
(8) In this section "relevant interception warrant"- | |
| |
| |
Grants for interception costs. | 13. - (1) The Secretary of State may, if he thinks fit, make such payments out of money provided by Parliament to any person providing- |
| |
| |
as the Secretary of State considers would represent an appropriate contribution towards costs incurred, or likely to be incurred, by that person in consequence of any one or more of the matters mentioned in subsection (2). | |
(2) Those matters are- | |
| |
| |
| |
Restrictions on use of intercepted material etc. | |
General safeguards. | 14. - (1) Subject to subsection (5), it shall be the duty of the Secretary of State to ensure, in relation to all interception warrants, that such arrangements are in force as he considers necessary for securing- |
| |
| |
(2) The requirements of this subsection are satisfied in relation to the intercepted material and any related communications data if each of the following- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
is limited to the minimum that is necessary for the authorised purposes. | |
(3) The requirements of this subsection are satisfied in relation to the intercepted material and any related communications data if each copy made of any of the material or data (if not destroyed earlier) is destroyed as soon as there are no longer any grounds for retaining it as necessary for any of the authorised purposes. | |
(4) For the purposes of this section something is necessary for the authorised purposes if, and only if- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(5) Arrangements in relation to interception warrants which are made for the purposes of subsection (1)- | |
| |
| |
(6) The requirements of this subsection are satisfied in the case of a warrant if it appears to the Secretary of State- | |
| |
| |
(7) In this section "copy", in relation to intercepted material or related communications data, means any of the following (whether or not in documentary form)- | |
| |
| |
and "copied" shall be construed accordingly. | |
Extra safeguards in the case of certificated warrants. | 15. - (1) For the purposes of section 14 the requirements of this section, in the case of a warrant in relation to which there is a section 8(3) certificate, are that the intercepted material is read, looked at or listened to by the persons to whom it becomes available by virtue of the warrant to the extent only that it- |
| |
| |
(2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), intercepted material falls within this subsection so far only as it is selected to be read, looked at or listened to otherwise than according to a factor which- | |
| |
| |
(3) Intercepted material falls within subsection (2), notwithstanding that it is selected by reference to any such factor as is mentioned in paragraph (a) and (b) of that subsection, if- | |
| |
| |
(4) Intercepted material also falls within subsection (2), notwithstanding that it is selected by reference to any such factor as is mentioned in paragraph (a) and (b) of that subsection, if- | |
| |
| |
(5) Those conditions are satisfied in relation to the selection of intercepted material if- | |
| |
| |
| |
(6) References in this section to its appearing that there has been a relevant change of circumstances are references to its appearing either- | |
| |
|
Exclusion of matters from legal proceedings. | 16. - (1) Subject to section 17, no evidence shall be adduced, question asked, assertion or disclosure made or other thing done in, for the purposes of or in connection with any legal proceedings which (in any manner)- |
| |
| |
(2) The following fall within this subsection- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(3) The persons referred to in subsection (2)(a) are- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(4) In this section "intercepted communication" means any communication intercepted in the course of its transmission by means of a postal service or telecommunication system. | |
Exceptions to section 16. | 17. - (1) Section 16(1) shall not apply in relation to- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(2) Section 16(1) shall not prohibit anything done in, for the purposes of, or in connection with, so much of any legal proceedings as relates to the fairness or unfairness of a dismissal on the grounds of any conduct constituting an offence under section 1(1) or (2), 11(7) or 18 of this Act, or section 1 of the Interception of Communications Act 1985. | |
(3) Section 16(1)(a) shall not prohibit the disclosure of any of the contents of a communication if the interception of that communication was lawful by virtue of section 1(5)(c), 3 or 4. | |
(4) Section 16(1)(b) shall not prohibit the doing of anything that discloses any conduct of a person for which he has been convicted of an offence under section 1(1) or (2), 11(7) or 18 of this Act, or section 1 of the Interception of Communications Act 1985. | |
(5) Nothing in section 16(1) shall prohibit any such disclosure of any information that continues to be available for disclosure as is confined to- | |
| |
| |
(6) A relevant judge shall not order a disclosure under subsection (5)(b) except where he is satisfied that the exceptional circumstances of the case make the disclosure essential in the interests of justice. | |
(7) Subject to subsection (8), where in any criminal proceedings- | |
| |
| |
he may direct the person conducting the prosecution to make for the purposes of the proceedings any such admission of fact as that judge thinks essential in the interests of justice. | |
(8) Nothing in any direction under subsection (7) shall authorise or require anything to be done in contravention of section 16(1). | |
(9) In this section "a relevant judge" means- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(10) In this section "relevant offence" means- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(11) In subsection (10) "intercepted communication" has the same meaning as in section 16. | |
Offence for unauthorised disclosures. | 18. - (1) Where an interception warrant has been issued or renewed, it shall be the duty of every person falling within subsection (2) to keep secret all the matters mentioned in subsection (3). |
(2) The persons falling within this subsection are- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(3) Those matters are- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(4) A person who makes a disclosure to another of anything that he is required to keep secret under this section shall be guilty of an offence and liable- | |
| |
| |
(5) In proceedings against any person for an offence under this section in respect of any disclosure, it shall be a defence for that person to show that he could not reasonably have been expected, after first becoming aware of the matter disclosed, to take steps to prevent the disclosure. | |
(6) In proceedings against any person for an offence under this section in respect of any disclosure, it shall be a defence for that person to show that- | |
| |
| |
(7) In proceedings against any person for an offence under this section in respect of any disclosure, it shall be a defence for that person to show that the disclosure was made by a legal adviser- | |
| |
| |
(8) Neither subsection (6) nor subsection (7) applies in the case of a disclosure made with a view to furthering any criminal purpose. | |
(9) In proceedings against any person for an offence under this section in respect of any disclosure, it shall be a defence for that person to show that the disclosure was authorised- | |
| |
| |
| |
Interpretation of Chapter I | |
Interpretation of Chapter I. | 19. In this Chapter- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
CHAPTER II | |
ACQUISITION AND DISCLOSURE OF COMMUNICATIONS DATA | |
Lawful acquisition and disclosure of communications data. | 20. - (1) This Chapter applies to- |
| |
| |
(2) Conduct to which this Chapter applies shall be lawful for all purposes if- | |
| |
| |
(3) A person shall not be subject to any civil liability in respect of any conduct of his which- | |
| |
| |
(4) In this Chapter "communications data" means any of the following- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(5) In this section "relevant enactment" means- | |
| |
| |
| |
(6) References in this section to data being attached to a communication include references to the data and the communication being logically associated with each other. | |
Obtaining and disclosing communications data. | 21. - (1) This section applies where a person designated for the purposes of this Chapter believes that it is necessary on grounds falling within subsection (2) to obtain any communications data. |
(2) It is necessary on grounds falling within this subsection to obtain communications data if it is necessary- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(3) Subject to subsection (5), the designated person may grant an authorisation for persons holding offices, ranks or positions with the same relevant public authority as the designated person to engage in any conduct to which this Chapter applies. | |
(4) Subject to subsection (5), where it appears to the designated person that a postal or telecommunications operator is or may be in possession of, or be capable of obtaining, any communications data, the designated person may, by notice to the postal or telecommunications operator, require the operator- | |
| |
| |
(5) The designated person shall not grant an authorisation under subsection (3), or give a notice under subsection (4), unless he believes that obtaining the data in question by the conduct authorised or required by the authorisation or notice is proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by so obtaining the data. | |
(6) It shall be the duty of the postal or telecommunications operator to comply, as soon as reasonably practicable, with the requirements of any notice given to him under subsection (4). | |
(7) The duty imposed by subsection (6) shall be enforceable by civil proceedings by the Secretary of State for an injunction, or for specific performance of a statutory duty under section 45 of the Court of Session Act 1988, or for any other appropriate relief. | |
Form and duration of authorisations and notices. | 22. - (1) An authorisation under section 21(3)- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(2) A notice under section 21(4) requiring communications data to be disclosed or to be obtained and disclosed- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(3) A notice under section 21(4) shall not require the disclosure of data to any person other than- | |
| |
| |
but the provisions of the notice shall not specify or otherwise identify a person for the purposes of paragraph (b) unless he holds an office, rank or position with the same relevant public authority as the person giving the notice. | |
(4) An authorisation under section 21(3) or notice under section 21(4)- | |
| |
| |
(5) An authorisation under section 21(3) or notice under section 21(4) may be renewed at any time before the end of the period of one month applying (in accordance with subsection (4) or subsection (7)) to that authorisation or notice. | |
(6) A renewal of an authorisation under section 21(3) or of a notice under section 21(4) shall be by the grant or giving, in accordance with this section, of a further authorisation or notice. | |
(7) Subsection (4) shall have effect in relation to a renewed authorisation or renewal notice as if the period of one month mentioned in that subsection did not begin until the end of the period of one month applicable to the authorisation or notice that is current at the time of the renewal. | |
(8) Where a person who has given a notice under subsection (4) of section 21 is satisfied- | |
| |
| |
he shall cancel the notice. | |
(9) The Secretary of State may by regulations provide for the person by whom any duty imposed by subsection (8) is to be performed in a case in which it would otherwise fall on a person who is no longer available to perform it; and regulations under this subsection may provide for the person on whom the duty is to fall to be a person appointed in accordance with the regulations. | |
Arrangements for payments. | 23. - (1) It shall be the duty of the Secretary of State to ensure that such arrangements are in force as he thinks appropriate for requiring or authorising, in such cases as he thinks fit, the making to postal and telecommunications operators of appropriate contributions towards the costs incurred by them in complying with notices under section 21(4). |
(2) For the purpose of complying with his duty under this section, the Secretary of State may make arrangements for payments to be made out of money provided by Parliament. | |
Interpretation of Chapter II. | 24. - (1) In this Chapter- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(2) Subject to subsection (3), the persons designated for the purposes of this Chapter are the individuals holding such offices, ranks or positions with relevant public authorities as are prescribed for the purposes of this subsection by an order made by the Secretary of State. | |
(3) The Secretary of State may by order impose restrictions- | |
| |
| |
(4) The Secretary of State may by order remove any person from the list of persons who are for the time being relevant public authorities for the purposes of this Chapter. |
PART II | |
SURVEILLANCE AND COVERT HUMAN INTELLIGENCE SOURCES | |
Introductory | |
Conduct to which Part II applies. | 25. - (1) This Part applies to the following conduct- |
| |
| |
| |
(2) For the purposes of this Part surveillance is directed if it is covert but not intrusive and is undertaken- | |
| |
| |
(3) Subject to subsections (4) and (5), surveillance is intrusive for the purposes of this Part if, and only if, it is covert surveillance that either- | |
| |
| |
(4) For the purposes of this Part surveillance is not intrusive to the extent that- | |
| |
| |
(5) For the purposes of this Part surveillance which- | |
| |
| |
is not intrusive unless the device is such that it consistently provides information of the same quality and detail as might be expected to be obtained from a device actually present on the premises or in the vehicle. | |
(6) In this Part- | |
| |
| |
(7) For the purposes of this Part a person is a covert human intelligence source if- | |
| |
| |
| |
(8) For the purposes of this section- | |
| |
| |
| |
(9) References in this section, in relation to a vehicle, to the presence of a surveillance device in the vehicle include references to its being located on or under the vehicle and also include references to its being attached to it. | |
Authorisation of surveillance and human intelligence sources | |
Lawful surveillance etc. | 26. - (1) Conduct to which this Part applies shall be lawful for all purposes if- |
| |
| |
(2) A person shall not be subject to any civil liability in respect of any conduct of his which- | |
| |
| |
(3) The conduct that may be authorised under this Part includes conduct outside the United Kingdom. | |
(4) In this section "relevant enactment" means- | |
| |
| |
| |
Authorisation of directed surveillance. | 27. - (1) Subject to the following provisions of this Part, the persons designated for the purposes of this section shall each have power to grant authorisations for the carrying out of directed surveillance. |
(2) A person shall not grant an authorisation for the carrying out of directed surveillance unless he believes- | |
| |
| |
(3) An authorisation is necessary on grounds falling within this subsection if it is necessary- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(4) The conduct that is authorised by an authorisation for the carrying out of directed surveillance is any conduct that- | |
| |
| |
| |
Authorisation of covert human intelligence sources. | 28. - (1) Subject to the following provisions of this Part, the persons designated for the purposes of this section shall each have power to grant authorisations for the conduct or the use of a covert human intelligence source. |
(2) A person shall not grant an authorisation for the conduct or the use of a covert human intelligence source unless he believes- | |
| |
| |
| |
(3) An authorisation is necessary on grounds falling within this subsection if it is necessary- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(4) The conduct that is authorised by an authorisation for the conduct or the use of a covert human intelligence source is any conduct that- | |
| |
| |
| |
(5) For the purposes of this Part there are arrangements for the source's case that satisfy the requirements of this subsection if such arrangements are in force as are necessary for ensuring- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(6) In this section "relevant investigating authority", in relation to an authorisation for the conduct or the use of an individual as a covert human intelligence source, means (subject to subsection (7)) the public authority for whose benefit the activities of that individual as such a source are to take place. | |
(7) In the case of any authorisation for the conduct or the use of a covert human intelligence source whose activities are to be for the benefit of more than one public authority, the references in subsection (5) to the relevant investigating authority are references to one of them. | |
Persons entitled to grant authorisations under ss. 27 and 28. | 29. - (1) Subject to subsection (3), the persons designated for the purposes of sections 27 and 28 are the individuals holding such offices, ranks or positions with relevant public authorities as are prescribed for the purposes of this subsection by an order made by the Secretary of State. |
(2) For the purposes of the grant of an authorisation that combines- | |
| |
| |
the Secretary of State himself shall be a person designated for the purposes of that section. | |
(3) The Secretary of State may by order impose restrictions- | |
| |
| |
(4) In this section "relevant public authority" means any of the following- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Authorisation of intrusive surveillance. | 30. - (1) Subject to the following provisions of this Part, the Secretary of State and each of the senior authorising officers shall have power to grant authorisations for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance. |
(2) Neither the Secretary of State nor any senior authorising officer shall grant an authorisation for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance unless he believes- | |
| |
| |
(3) Subject to the following provisions of this section, an authorisation is necessary on grounds falling within this subsection if it is necessary- | |
| |
| |
| |
(4) The matters to be taken into account in considering whether the requirements of subsection (2) are satisfied in the case of any authorisation shall include whether the information which it is thought necessary to obtain by the authorised conduct could reasonably be obtained by other means. | |
(5) The conduct that is authorised by an authorisation for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance is any conduct that- | |
| |
| |
| |
(6) For the purposes of this section the senior authorising officers are- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Police and customs authorisations | |
Rules for grant of authorisations. | 31. - (1) A person who is a designated person for the purposes of section 27 or 28 by reference to his office, rank or position with a police force, the National Criminal Intelligence Service or the National Crime Squad shall not grant an authorisation under that section except on an application made by a member of the same force, Service or Squad. |
(2) A person who is designated for the purposes of section 27 or 28 by reference to his office, rank or position with the Commissioners of Customs and Excise shall not grant an authorisation under that section except on an application made by a customs officer. | |
(3) A person who is a senior authorising officer by reference to a police force, the National Criminal Intelligence Service or the National Crime Squad shall not grant an authorisation for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance except- | |
| |
| |
(4) A person who is a senior authorising officer by virtue of a designation by the Commissioners of Customs and Excise shall not grant an authorisation for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance except on an application made by a customs officer. | |
(5) A single authorisation may combine both- | |
| |
| |
but the provisions of this Act or that Act that are applicable in the case of each of the authorisations shall apply separately in relation to the part of the combined authorisation to which they are applicable. | |
(6) For the purposes of this section- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
and references in this section to the United Kingdom or to any part or area of the United Kingdom include any adjacent waters within the seaward limits of the territorial waters of the United Kingdom. | |
(7) For the purposes of this section a person is subject to service discipline- | |
| |
| |
| |
Grant of authorisations in the senior officer's absence. | 32. - (1) This section applies in the case of an application for an authorisation for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance where- |
| |
| |
(2) If - | |
| |
| |
the application may be made to and considered by any person who is entitled under subsection (4) to act for any senior authorising officer who would have been entitled to consider the application. | |
(3) A person who considers an application under subsection (1) shall have the same power to grant an authorisation as the person for whom he is entitled to act. | |
(4) For the purposes of this section- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(5) A police member of the National Criminal Intelligence Service or the National Crime Squad appointed under section 9(1)(b) or 55(1)(b) of the Police Act 1997 (police members) may not be designated under subsection (4)(i) or (j) unless he holds the rank of assistant chief constable in that Service or Squad. | |
(6) In this section "designated deputy"- | |
| |
| |
| |
Notification of authorisations for intrusive surveillance. | 33. - (1) Where a person grants or cancels a police or customs authorisation for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance, he shall give notice that he has done so to an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner. |
(2) A notice given for the purposes of subsection (1)- | |
| |
| |
| |
(3) A notice under this section of the grant of an authorisation shall, as the case may be, either- | |
| |
| |
(4) Where a notice for the purposes of subsection (1) of the grant of an authorisation has been received by an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner, he shall, as soon as practicable- | |
| |
| |
(5) The Secretary of State shall not make an order under subsection (2)(c) unless a draft of the order has been laid before Parliament and approved by a resolution of each House. | |
(6) Any notice that is required by any provision of this section to be given in writing may be given, instead, by being transmitted by electronic means. | |
(7) In this section references to a police or customs authorisation are references to an authorisation granted by- | |
| |
| |
| |
Approval required for authorisations to take effect. | 34. - (1) This section applies where an authorisation for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance has been granted on the application of- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(2) Subject to subsection (3), the authorisation shall not take effect until such time (if any) as- | |
| |
| |
(3) Where the person who grants the authorisation- | |
| |
| |
subsection (2) shall not apply to the authorisation, and the authorisation shall have effect from the time of its grant. | |
(4) Where subsection (2) applies to the authorisation- | |
| |
| |
(5) If an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner decides not to approve an authorisation to which subsection (2) applies, he shall make a report of his findings to the most senior relevant person. | |
(6) In this section "the most senior relevant person" means- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(7) The references in subsection (6) to a person's deputy are references to the following- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
and in this subsection and that subsection "designated deputy" has the same meaning as in section 32. | |
(8) Any notice that is required by any provision of this section to be given in writing may be given, instead, by being transmitted by electronic means. | |
Quashing of police and customs authorisations etc. | 35. - (1) This section applies where an authorisation for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance has been granted on the application of- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(2) Where an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner is at any time satisfied that, at the time the authorisation was granted or at any time when it was renewed, there were no reasonable grounds for believing that the requirements of section 30(2)(a) and (b) were satisfied, he may quash the authorisation with effect, as he thinks fit, from the time of the grant of the authorisation or from the time of any renewal of the authorisation. | |
(3) If an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner is satisfied at any time while the authorisation is in force that there are no longer any reasonable grounds for believing that the requirements of section 30(2)(a) and (b) are satisfied in relation to the authorisation, he may cancel the authorisation with effect from such time as appears to him to be the time from which those requirements ceased to be so satisfied. | |
(4) Where, in the case of any authorisation of which notice has been given in accordance with section 33(3)(b), an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner is at any time satisfied that, at the time of the grant or renewal of the authorisation to which that notice related, there were no reasonable grounds for believing that the case was one of urgency, he may quash the authorisation with effect, as he thinks fit, from the time of the grant of the authorisation or from the time of any renewal of the authorisation. | |
(5) Subject to subsection (7), where an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner quashes an authorisation under this section, he may order the destruction of any records relating wholly or partly to information obtained by the authorised conduct after the time from which his decision takes effect. | |
(6) Subject to subsection (7), where- | |
| |
| |
he may order the destruction of any records relating, wholly or partly, to information obtained at such a time by the authorised conduct. | |
(7) No order shall be made under this section for the destruction of any records required for pending criminal or civil proceedings. | |
(8) Where an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner exercises a power conferred by this section, he shall, as soon as reasonably practicable, make a report of his exercise of that power and of his reasons for doing so- | |
| |
| |
(9) Where an order for the destruction of records is made under this section, the order shall not become operative until such time (if any) as- | |
| |
| |
(10) No notice shall be required to be given under section 33(1) in the case of a cancellation under subsection (3) of this section. |
Appeals against decisions by Surveillance Commissioners. | 36. - (1) Any senior authorising officer may appeal to the Chief Surveillance Commissioner against any of the following- |
| |
| |
| |
(2) In the case of an authorisation granted by the designated deputy of a senior authorising office or by a person who for the purposes of section 32 is entitled to act for a senior authorising officer, that designated deputy or person shall also be entitled to appeal under this section. | |
(3) An appeal under this section must be brought within the period of seven days beginning with the day on which the refusal or decision appealed against is reported to the appellant. | |
(4) Subject to subsection (5), the Chief Surveillance Commissioner, on an appeal under this section, shall allow the appeal if- | |
| |
| |
(5) If, on an appeal falling within subsection (1)(b), the Chief Surveillance Commissioner- | |
| |
| |
he may modify that Commissioner's decision to quash or cancel the authorisation, and any related decision for the destruction of records, so as to give effect to the decision under section 35 that he considers should have been made. | |
(6) Where, on an appeal under this section against a decision to quash or cancel an authorisation, the Chief Surveillance Commissioner allows the appeal he shall also quash any related order for the destruction of records relating to information obtained by the authorised conduct. | |
(7) In this section "designated deputy" has the same meaning as in section 32. | |
Appeals to the Chief Surveillance Commissioner: supplementary. | 37. - (1) Where the Chief Surveillance Commissioner has determined an appeal under section 36, he shall give notice of his determination to both- |
| |
| |
(2) Where the determination of the Chief Surveillance Commissioner on an appeal under section 36 is a determination to dismiss the appeal, the Chief Surveillance Commissioner shall make a report of his findings- | |
| |
| |
(3) Subsections (3) and (4) of section 107 of the Police Act 1997 (reports to be laid before Parliament and exclusion of matters from the report) apply in relation to any report to the Prime Minister under subsection (2) of this section as they apply in relation to any report under subsection (2) of that section. | |
(4) Subject to subsection (2) of this section, the Chief Surveillance Commissioner shall not give any reasons for any determination of his on an appeal under section 36. | |
Information to be provided to Surveillance Commissioners. | 38. It shall be the duty of- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
to comply with any request of a Surveillance Commissioner for documents or information required by that Commissioner for the purpose of enabling him to carry out the functions of such a Commissioner under sections 33 to 37. | |
Other authorisations | |
Secretary of State authorisations. | 39. - (1) The Secretary of State shall not grant an authorisation for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance except on an application made by- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(2) Section 30 shall have effect in relation to the grant of an authorisation by the Secretary of State on the application of an official of the Ministry of Defence, or of a member of Her Majesty's forces, as if the only matters mentioned in subsection (3) of that section were- | |
| |
| |
(3) The designation of any public authority for the purposes of this section shall be by order made by the Secretary of State. | |
(4) The Secretary of State may by order impose restrictions- | |
| |
| |
(5) References in this section to a member of Her Majesty's forces do not include references to any member of Her Majesty's forces who is a member of a police force by virtue of his service with the Royal Navy Regulating Branch, the Royal Military Police or the Royal Air Force Police. | |
Intelligence services authorisations. | 40. - (1) The grant by the Secretary of State on the application of a member of one of the intelligence services of any authorisation under this Part must be made by the issue of a warrant. |
(2) A single warrant issued by the Secretary of State may combine both- | |
| |
| |
but the provisions of this Act or the Intelligence Services Act 1994 that are applicable in the case of the authorisation under this Part or the intelligence services warrant shall apply separately in relation to the part of the combined warrant to which they are applicable. | |
(3) Intrusive surveillance in relation to any premises or vehicle in the British Islands shall be capable of being authorised by a warrant issued under this Part on the application of a member of the Secret Intelligence Service or GCHQ only if the authorisation contained in the warrant is one satisfying the requirements of section 30(2)(a) otherwise than in connection with any functions of that intelligence service in support of the prevention or detection of serious crime. | |
(4) Subject to subsection (5), the functions of the Security Service shall include acting on behalf of the Secret Intelligence Service or GCHQ in relation to- | |
| |
| |
(5) Nothing in subsection (4) shall authorise the doing of anything by one intelligence service on behalf of another unless- | |
| |
| |
(6) In this section "intelligence services warrant" means a warrant under section 5 of the Intelligence Services Act 1994. | |
Grant, renewal and duration of authorisations | |
General rules about grant, renewal and duration. | 41. - (1) An authorisation under this Part- |
| |
| |
(2) A single authorisation may combine two or more different authorisations under this Part; but the provisions of this Act that are applicable in the case of each of the authorisations shall apply separately in relation to the part of the combined authorisation to which they are applicable. | |
(3) Subject to subsection (4), an authorisation under this Part shall cease to have effect at the end of the following period- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(4) Subject to subsection (6), an authorisation under this Part may be renewed, at any time before the time at which it ceases to have effect, by any person who would be entitled to grant a new authorisation in the same terms. | |
(5) Sections 27 to 39 shall have effect in relation to the renewal of an authorisation under this Part as if references to the grant of an authorisation included references to its renewal. | |
(6) A person shall not renew an authorisation for the conduct or the use of a covert human intelligence source, unless he- | |
| |
| |
(7) The matters mentioned in subsection (6) are- | |
| |
| |
(8) References in this section to the time at which, or the day on which, the grant or renewal of an authorisation takes effect are references, except in the case of an authorisation that takes effect in accordance with section 34(2), to the time at which or, as the case may be, the day on which the authorisation is granted or renewed. | |
(9) In relation to any authorisation granted by a member of any of the intelligence services, and in relation to any authorisation contained in a warrant issued by the Secretary of State on the application of a member of any of the intelligence services, this section has effect subject to the provisions of section 42. |
Special rules for intelligence services authorisations. | 42. - (1) Subject to subsection (2), a warrant containing an authorisation for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance- |
| |
| |
except under the hand of the Secretary of State. | |
(2) In an urgent case in which- | |
| |
| |
the warrant may be issued (but not renewed) under the hand of a senior official. | |
(3) A warrant containing an authorisation for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance which- | |
| |
| |
shall cease to have effect at the end of the second working day following the day of the issue of the warrant, instead of at the time provided for by section 41(3). | |
(4) Subject to subsection (3), where any warrant for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance which is issued or was last renewed on the application of a member of any of the intelligence services, the warrant (unless renewed or, as the case may be, renewed again) shall cease to have effect at the following time, instead of at the time provided for by section 41(3), namely- | |
| |
| |
(5) Where- | |
| |
| |
the authorisation (unless renewed again) shall cease to have effect at the end of the period of six months beginning with the day on which it would have ceased to have effect but for the renewal, instead of at the time provided for by section 41(3). | |
(6) Notwithstanding anything in section 41(2), in a case in which there is a combined warrant containing both- | |
| |
| |
the reference in subsection (4) of this section to a warrant for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance is a reference to the warrant so far as it confers both authorisations. | |
Cancellation of authorisations. | 43. - (1) The person who granted or, as the case may be, last renewed an authorisation under this Part shall cancel it if- |
| |
| |
(2) Where an authorisation under this Part was granted or, as the case may be, last renewed- | |
| |
| |
that other person shall cancel the authorisation if he is satisfied as to either of the matters mentioned in subsection (1). | |
(3) Where an authorisation under this Part was granted or, as the case may be, last renewed by a person whose deputy had power to grant it, that deputy shall cancel the authorisation if he is satisfied as to either of the matters mentioned in subsection (1). | |
(4) The Secretary of State may by regulations provide for the person by whom any duty imposed by this section is to be performed in a case in which it would otherwise fall on a person designated for the purposes of section 27 or 28 who is no longer available to perform it. | |
(5) Regulations under subsection (4) may provide for the person on whom the duty is to fall to be a person appointed in accordance with the regulations. | |
(6) The references in this section to a person's deputy are references to the following- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(7) In this section "designated deputy" has the same meaning as in section 32. | |
Supplemental provision for Part II | |
Power to extend or modify authorisation provisions. | 44. - (1) The Secretary of State may by order do any one or more of the following- |
| |
| |
| |
(2) No order shall be made under this section unless a draft of it has been laid before Parliament and approved by a resolution of each House. | |
Interpretation of Part II. | 45. - (1) In this Part- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(2) Subject to subsection (3), in this Part "surveillance" includes- | |
| |
| |
| |
(3) References in this Part to surveillance do not include references to- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(4) References in this Part to surveillance include references to the interception of a communication in the course of its transmission by means of a postal service or telecommunication system if, and only if- | |
| |
| |
(5) References in this Part to an individual holding an office or position with a public authority include references to any member, official or employee of that authority. | |
(6) For the purposes of this Part the activities of a covert human intelligence source which are to be taken as activities for the benefit of a particular public authority include any conduct of his as such a source which is in response to inducements or requests made by or on behalf of that authority. | |
(7) References in this Part to a police force do not include references to a police force maintained under or by virtue of section 1 of the Police (Scotland) Act 1967. | |
(8) In subsection (1)- | |
| |
| |
(9) In this section- | |
| |
|
PART III | |
INVESTIGATION OF ELECTRONIC DATA PROTECTED BY ENCRYPTION ETC. | |
Power to require disclosure of key | |
Notices requiring disclosure of key. | 46. - (1) This section applies where any protected information- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(2) If any person with the appropriate permission under Schedule 1 believes, on reasonable grounds- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
the person with that permission may, by notice to the person whom he believes to have possession of the key, require the disclosure of the key. | |
(3) A requirement to disclose a key is necessary on grounds falling within this subsection if it is necessary- | |
| |
| |
| |
(4) A notice under this section requiring the disclosure of any key- | |
| |
| |
| |
(5) A notice under this section shall not require the disclosure of a key to any person other than- | |
| |
| |
(6) A notice under this section shall not require the disclosure of any key which- | |
| |
| |
(7) Schedule 1 (definition of the appropriate permission) shall have effect. | |
Disclosure of information in place of key. | 47. - (1) Subsection (2) applies where- |
| |
| |
(2) The person required to disclose the key- | |
| |
| |
(3) Compliance with a requirement to disclose a key to protected information by the provision of the information in an intelligible form is authorised for the purposes of this section unless- | |
| |
| |
has given a direction that the requirement can be complied with only by the disclosure of the key itself. | |
(4) A person shall not give a direction for the purposes of subsection (3) unless he believes that the giving of the direction is proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by prohibiting any compliance with the requirement in question otherwise than by the disclosure of the key itself. | |
Arrangements for payments for key disclosure. | 48. - (1) It shall be the duty of the Secretary of State to ensure that such arrangements are in force as he thinks appropriate for requiring or authorising, in such cases as he thinks fit, the making to persons to whom section 46 notices are given of appropriate contributions towards the costs incurred by them in complying with such notices. |
(2) For the purpose of complying with his duty under this section, the Secretary of State may make arrangements for payments to be made out of money provided by Parliament. | |
Offences | |
Failure to comply with a notice. | 49. - (1) A person is guilty of an offence if- |
| |
| |
(2) In proceedings against any person for an offence under this section, it shall be a defence (subject to subsection (4)) for that person to show- | |
| |
| |
(3) In proceedings against any person for an offence under this section it shall be a defence (subject to subsection (4)) for that person to show- | |
| |
| |
| |
(4) Except in a case where there is no authorisation for the purposes of section 47, in proceedings for an offence under this section a person shall have a defence under subsection (2) or (3) only if he also shows that it was not reasonably practicable for him to comply with the requirement in the manner allowed by that section. | |
(5) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable- | |
| |
|
Tipping-off. | 50. - (1) This section applies where a section 46 notice contains a provision requiring- |
| |
| |
to keep secret the giving of the notice, its contents and the things done in pursuance of it. | |
(2) A section 46 notice shall not contain a requirement to keep anything secret except where the key to which it relates is a key to protected information which- | |
| |
| |
by means which it is reasonable, in order to maintain the effectiveness of any investigation or of investigatory techniques generally, or in the interests of the safety or well-being of any person, to keep secret from a particular person. | |
(3) A person who makes a disclosure to any other person of anything that he is required by a section 46 notice to keep secret shall be guilty of an offence and liable- | |
| |
| |
(4) In proceedings against any person for an offence under this section in respect of any disclosure, it shall be a defence for that person to show that- | |
| |
| |
(5) In proceedings against any person for an offence under this section in respect of any disclosure, it shall be a defence for that person to show that- | |
| |
| |
(6) In proceedings against any person for an offence under this section in respect of any disclosure, it shall be a defence for that person to show that the disclosure was made by a legal adviser- | |
| |
| |
(7) Neither subsection (5) nor subsection (6) applies in the case of a disclosure made with a view to furthering any criminal purpose. | |
(8) In proceedings against any person for an offence under this section in respect of any disclosure, it shall be a defence for that person to show that the disclosure was authorised by or on behalf of either the person who gave the notice or a person who- | |
| |
| |
(9) In proceedings for an offence under this section against a person other than the person to whom the notice was given, it shall be a defence for the person against whom the proceedings are brought to show that he neither knew nor had reasonable grounds for suspecting that the notice contained a requirement to keep secret what was disclosed. | |
Safeguards | |
General duties of specified authorities. | 51. - (1) This section applies to- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(2) It shall be the duty of each of the persons to whom this section applies to ensure that such arrangements are in force, in relation to persons under his control who by virtue of this Part obtain possession of keys to protected information, as he considers necessary for securing- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(3) The requirements of this subsection are satisfied in relation to any key disclosed in pursuance of a section 46 notice if- | |
| |
| |
are each limited to the minimum that is necessary for the purpose of enabling protected information to be put into an intelligible form. | |
(4) In this section "chief officer of police" means any of the following- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Interpretation of Part III | |
Interpretation of Part III. | 52. - (1) In this Part- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(2) References in this Part to a person's having in his possession a key to any protected information include references to his having an immediate right of access to the key, or an immediate right to have it transmitted or otherwise supplied to him. | |
(3) References in this Part to a person's having protected information in his possession include references- | |
| |
| |
(4) References in this Part to something's being intelligible or being put into an intelligible form include references to its being in the condition in which it was before an encryption or similar process was applied to it or, as the case may be, to its being restored to that condition. | |
(5) In this section- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
PART IV | |
SCRUTINY ETC. OF INVESTIGATORY POWERS AND OF THE FUNCTIONS OF THE INTELLIGENCE SERVICES | |
Commissioners | |
New Commissioners. | 53. - (1) The Prime Minister shall appoint two Commissioners, to be known as the Interception of Communications Commissioner and the Covert Investigations Commissioner. |
(2) Subject to subsection (5), the Interception of Communications Commissioner shall keep under review- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(3) Subject to subsection (5), the Covert Investigations Commissioner shall keep under review, so far as they are not required to be kept under review by the Security Service Act Commissioner, the Intelligence Services Act Commissioner or the Chief Surveillance Commissioner- | |
| |
| |
| |
(4) The Interception of Communications Commissioner and the Covert Investigations Commissioner shall each give the Tribunal all such assistance (including his opinion as to any issue falling to be determined by the Tribunal) as the Tribunal may require- | |
| |
| |
(5) It shall not be the function of either Commissioner to keep under review the exercise of any power of the Secretary of State to make, amend or revoke any subordinate legislation. | |
(6) A person shall not be appointed under this section as a Commissioner unless- | |
| |
| |
(7) Each of the Commissioners shall hold office in accordance with the terms of his appointment; and there shall be paid to each Commissioner out of money provided by Parliament such allowances as the Treasury may determine. | |
(8) On the coming into force of this section the Commissioner holding office as the Commissioner under section 8 of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 shall take and hold office as the Interception of Communications Commissioner as if appointed under this Act- | |
| |
| |
(9) In this section "judicial authority" means- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Co-operation with and reports by new Commissioners. | 54. - (1) It shall be the duty of- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
to disclose or provide to the Interception of Communications Commissioner all such documents and information as he may require for the purpose of enabling him to carry out his functions under section 53. | |
(2) It shall be the duty of- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
to disclose or provide to that Commissioner all such documents and information as he may require for the purpose of enabling him to carry out his functions. | |
(3) If it at any time appears to the Interception of Communications Commissioner or the Covert Investigations Commissioner- | |
| |
| |
he shall make a report to the Prime Minister with respect to that contravention. | |
(4) If it at any time appears to the Interception of Communications Commissioner that any arrangements by reference to which the duties imposed by sections 14 and 51 have sought to be discharged have proved inadequate in relation to any matter with which the Commissioner is concerned, he shall make a report to the Prime Minister with respect to those arrangements. | |
(5) As soon as practicable after the end of each calendar year, the Interception of Communications Commissioner and the Covert Investigations Commissioner shall each make a report to the Prime Minister with respect to the carrying out of that Commissioner's functions. | |
(6) The Prime Minister shall lay before each House of Parliament a copy of every annual report made by a Commissioner under subsection (5), together with a statement as to whether any matter has been excluded from that copy in pursuance of subsection (7). | |
(7) If it appears to the Prime Minister, after consultation with the Commissioner in question, that the publication of any matter in an annual report would be contrary to the public interest or prejudicial to- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
the Prime Minister may exclude that matter from the copy of the report as laid before each House of Parliament. | |
Additional functions of other Commissioners. | 55. - (1) Subject to subsection (5), the Security Service Act Commissioner shall (in addition to his functions under the Security Service Act 1989) keep under review, so far as they are not required to be kept under review by the Interception of Communications Commissioner- |
| |
| |
| |
(2) Subject to subsection (5), the Intelligence Services Act Commissioner shall (in addition to his functions under the Intelligence Services Act 1994) keep under review, so far as they are not required to be kept under review by the Interception of Communications Commissioner- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(3) The Chief Surveillance Commissioner shall (in addition to his functions under the Police Act 1997) keep under review, so far as they are not required to be kept under review by the Interception of Communications Commissioner, the Security Service Act Commissioner or the Intelligence Services Act Commissioner- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(4) The Chief Surveillance Commissioner may require any ordinary Surveillance Commissioner to provide him with assistance in carrying out his functions under subsection (3); and that assistance may include- | |
| |
| |
(5) It shall not by virtue of this section be the function of any Commissioner to keep under review the exercise of any power of the Secretary of State to make, amend or revoke any subordinate legislation. | |
(6) Subsection (5) of section 39 shall apply for the purposes of this section as it applies for the purposes of that section. | |
The Tribunal | |
The Tribunal. | 56. - (1) There shall, for the purpose of exercising the jurisdiction conferred on them by this section, be a tribunal consisting of such number of members as Her Majesty may by Letters Patent appoint. |
(2) The jurisdiction of the Tribunal shall be- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(3) Proceedings fall within this subsection if- | |
| |
| |
| |
(4) The Tribunal is the appropriate forum for any complaint if it is a complaint by a person who is aggrieved by any conduct falling within subsection (5) which he believes- | |
| |
| |
(5) Subject to subsection (6), conduct falls within this subsection if (whenever it occurred) it is- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(6) For the purposes only of subsection (3), conduct to which Part II applies, an entry on or interference with property or an interference with wireless telegraphy is not conduct falling within subsection (5) unless it is conduct by or on behalf of a person holding any office, rank or position with- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
and section 45(5) applies for the purposes of this subsection as it applies for the purposes of Part II. | |
(7) For the purposes of this section conduct takes place in challengeable circumstances if- | |
| |
| |
(8) The following fall within this subsection- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(9) Schedule 2 (which makes further provision in relation to the Tribunal) shall have effect. | |
(10) In this section- | |
| |
| |
| |
and the reference in paragraph (b) to a person's having possession of a key or of protected information shall be construed in accordance with section 52. | |
Orders allocating proceedings to the Tribunal. | 57. - (1) An order under section 56(2)(d) allocating proceedings to the Tribunal may- |
| |
| |
(2) In making any provision by an order under section 56(2)(d) the Secretary of State shall have regard, in particular, to- | |
| |
| |
(3) The Secretary of State shall not make an order under section 56(2)(d) unless a draft of the order has been laid before Parliament and approved by a resolution of each House. |
Exercise of the Tribunal's jurisdiction. | 58. - (1) Subject to subsections (4) and (5), it shall be the duty of the Tribunal- |
| |
| |
(2) Where the Tribunal hear any proceedings by virtue of section 56(2)(a), they shall apply the same principles for making their determination in those proceedings as would be applied by a court on an application for judicial review. | |
(3) Where the Tribunal consider a complaint made to them by virtue of section 56(2)(b), it shall be the duty of the Tribunal- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(4) The Tribunal shall not be under any duty to hear, consider or determine any proceedings, complaint or reference if it appears to them that the bringing of the proceedings or the making of the complaint or reference is frivolous or vexatious. | |
(5) Except where the Tribunal, having regard to all the circumstances, are satisfied that it is equitable to do so, they shall not consider or determine any complaint made by virtue of section 56(2)(b) if it is made more than one year after the taking place of the conduct to which it relates. | |
(6) Subject to any provision made by rules under section 60, the Tribunal on determining any proceedings, complaint or reference shall have power to make any such award of compensation or other order as they think fit; and, without prejudice to the power to make rules under section 60(2)(h), the other orders that may be made by the Tribunal include- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(7) Except to such extent as the Secretary of State may by order otherwise provide, determinations, awards, orders and other decisions of the Tribunal (including decisions as to whether they have jurisdiction) shall not be subject to appeal or be liable to be questioned in any court. | |
(8) The provision that may be contained in an order under subsection (7) may include- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(9) The Secretary of State shall not make an order under subsection (7) unless a draft of the order has been laid before Parliament and approved by a resolution of each House. | |
Tribunal procedure. | 59. - (1) Subject to any rules made under section 60, the Tribunal shall be entitled to determine their own procedure in relation to any proceedings, complaint or reference brought before or made to them. |
(2) The Tribunal shall have power- | |
| |
| |
to require a relevant Commissioner appearing to the Tribunal to have functions in relation to the matter in question to provide the Tribunal with all such assistance (including that Commissioner's opinion as to any issue falling to be determined by the Tribunal) as the Tribunal think fit. | |
(3) Where the Tribunal hear or consider any proceedings, complaint or reference relating to any matter, they shall secure that every relevant Commissioner appearing to them to have functions in relation to that matter- | |
| |
| |
(4) Where the Tribunal determine any proceedings, complaint or reference brought before or made to them, they shall give notice to the complainant which (subject to any rules made by virtue of section 60(2)(i)) shall be confined, as the case may be, to either- | |
| |
| |
(5) Where- | |
| |
| |
they shall make a report of their findings to the Prime Minister. | |
(6) It shall be the duty of the persons specified in subsection (7) to disclose or provide to the Tribunal all such documents and information as the Tribunal may require for the purpose of enabling them- | |
| |
| |
(7) Those persons are- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(8) In this section "relevant Commissioner" means the Interception of Communications Commissioner, the Covert Investigations Commissioner, the Security Service Act Commissioner, the Intelligence Services Act Commissioner or any Surveillance Commissioner. | |
Tribunal rules. | 60. - (1) The Secretary of State may make rules regulating the exercise by the Tribunal of the jurisdiction conferred on them by or under section 56 and any matters preliminary or incidental to, or arising out of, the hearing or consideration of any proceedings, complaint or reference brought before or made to the Tribunal. |
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), rules under this section may- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(3) Rules under this section in relation to the hearing or consideration of any matter by the Tribunal may provide- | |
| |
| |
| |
(4) The power to make rules under this section includes power to make rules- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(5) Rules under this section may also include provision- | |
| |
| |
(6) In making rules under this section the Secretary of State shall have regard, in particular, to- | |
| |
| |
(7) Rules under this section may make provision by the application, with or without modification, of the provision from time to time contained in specified rules of court. | |
(8) No rules shall be made under this section unless a draft of them has first been laid before Parliament and approved by a resolution of each House. | |
Abolition of jurisdiction in relation to complaints. | 61. - (1) The provisions set out in subsection (2) (which provide for the investigation etc. of certain complaints) shall not apply in relation to any complaint made after the coming into force of this section. |
(2) Those provisions are- | |
| |
| |
| |
Codes of practice | |
Issue and revision of codes of practice. | 62. - (1) The Secretary of State shall issue one or more codes of practice relating to the exercise and performance of the powers and duties mentioned in subsection (2). |
(2) Those powers and duties are those (excluding any power to make subordinate legislation) that are conferred or imposed otherwise than on the Surveillance Commissioners by or under- | |
| |
| |
| |
(3) Before issuing a code of practice under subsection (1), the Secretary of State shall- | |
| |
| |
and the Secretary of State may incorporate in the code finally issued any modifications made by him to the draft after its publication. | |
(4) The Secretary of State shall lay before both Houses of Parliament every draft code of practice prepared and published by him under this section. | |
(5) A code of practice issued by the Secretary of State under this section shall not be brought into force except in accordance with an order made by the Secretary of State. | |
(6) An order under subsection (5) may contain such transitional provisions and savings as appear to the Secretary of State to be necessary or expedient in connection with the bringing into force of the code brought into force by that order. | |
(7) The Secretary of State may from time to time- | |
| |
| |
(8) Subsections (3) to (6) shall apply (with appropriate modifications) in relation to the issue of any revised code under this section as they apply in relation to the first issue of such a code. | |
(9) The Secretary of State shall not make an order containing provision for any of the purposes of this section unless a draft of the order has been laid before Parliament and approved by a resolution of each House. | |
Effect of codes of practice. | 63. - (1) A person exercising or performing any power or duty in relation to which provision may be made by a code of practice under section 62 shall, in doing so, have regard to the provisions (so far as they are applicable) of every code of practice for the time being in force under that section. |
(2) A failure on the part of any person to comply with any provision of a code of practice for the time being in force under section 62 shall not of itself render him liable to any criminal or civil proceedings. | |
(3) A code of practice in force at any time under section 62 shall be admissible in evidence in any criminal or civil proceedings. | |
(4) If any provision of a code of practice issued or revised under section 62 appears to- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
to be relevant to any question arising in the proceedings, or in connection with the exercise of that jurisdiction or the carrying out of those functions, in relation to a time when it was in force, that provision of the code shall be taken into account in determining that question. | |
(5) In this section "relevant Commissioner" means the Interception of Communications Commissioner, the Covert Investigations Commissioner, the Security Service Act Commissioner or the Intelligence Services Act Commissioner. |
PART V | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MISCELLANEOUS AND SUPPLEMENTAL | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conduct in relation to wireless telegraphy. | 64. - (1) Section 5 of the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949 (misleading messages and interception and disclosure of wireless telegraphy messages) shall become subsection (1) of that section. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) In paragraph (b) of that subsection- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) In that section, after that subsection there shall be inserted- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warrants under the Intelligence Services Act 1994. | 65. - (1) In subsection (2) of section 5 of the Intelligence Services Act 1994 (the circumstances in which the Secretary of State may issue a warrant authorising interference with property or wireless telegraphy)- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) After that subsection, there shall be inserted- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) In each of sections 6(1)(b) and 7(5)(b) of that Act (warrants issued under the hand of a senior official of the Secretary of State's department), the words "of his department" shall be omitted. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) In section 11 of that Act (interpretation), for paragraph (1)(d) there shall be substituted- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Authorisations under Part III of the Police Act 1997. | 66. - (1) Section 93 of the Police Act 1997 (authorisations to interfere with property etc.) shall be amended as follows. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) In subsection (1) (the action that the authorising officer may authorise), for "or" at the end of paragraph (a) there shall be substituted- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) After that subsection there shall be inserted- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) In subsection (2) (the grounds on which action may be authorised)- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5) After subsection (2) there shall be inserted- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6) In subsection (5) (the meaning of authorising officer)- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7) In subsection (6) (the meaning of relevant area), after paragraph (c) there shall be inserted- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8) After that subsection there shall be inserted- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ministerial expenditure etc. | 67. There shall be paid out of money provided by Parliament- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orders, regulations and rules. | 68. - (1) This section applies to any power of the Secretary of State to make any order, regulations or rules under any provision of this Act. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) The powers to which this section applies shall be exercisable by statutory instrument. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) A statutory instrument containing any order or regulations made in exercise of a power to which this section applies, other than one containing- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) Any order, regulations or rules made in exercise of a power to which this section applies may- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Criminal liability of directors etc. | 69. - (1) Where an offence under any provision of this Act is committed by a body corporate and is proved to have been committed with the consent or connivance of, or to be attributable to any neglect on the part of- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
he (as well as the body corporate) shall be guilty of that offence and liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) Where an offence under any provision of this Act- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
he (as well as the firm) shall be guilty of that offence and liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) In this section "director", in relation to a body corporate whose affairs are managed by its members, means a member of the body corporate. |
General saving for lawful conduct. | 70. Nothing in any of the provisions of this Act by virtue of which conduct of any description is or may be authorised by any warrant, authorisation or notice, or by virtue of which information may be obtained in any manner, shall be construed- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
General interpretation. | 71. - (1) In this Act- |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(2) In this Act- | |
| |
| |
(3) Those tests are- | |
| |
| |
(4) In this Act "criminal proceedings" includes- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
and references in this Act to criminal prosecutions shall be construed accordingly. | |
(5) In this Act- | |
| |
| |
(6) If it appears to the Secretary of State that it is necessary to do so in consequence of any changes to the structure or grading of the civil service, he may by order make such amendments of the definition of "senior official" in subsection (1) as appear to him appropriate to preserve, so far as practicable, the effect of that definition. | |
Amendments, repeals and savings etc. | 72. - (1) The enactments specified in Schedule 3 (amendments consequential on the provisions of this Act) shall have effect with the amendments set out in that Schedule. |
(2) The enactments mentioned in Schedule 4 are hereby repealed to the extent specified in the third column of that Schedule. | |
(3) For the avoidance of doubt it is hereby declared that nothing in this Act (except paragraphs 1 and 2 of Schedule 3) affects any power conferred on the Post Office by or under any enactment to open, detain or delay any postal packet or to deliver any such packet to a person other than the person to whom it is addressed. | |
(4) Where any warrant under the Interception of Communications Act 1985 is in force under that Act at the time when the repeal by this Act of section 2 of that Act comes into force, the conduct authorised by that warrant shall be deemed for the period which- | |
| |
| |
as if it were conduct authorised by an interception warrant issued in accordance with the requirements of Chapter I of Part I of this Act. | |
(5) In relation to any such warrant, any certificate issued for the purposes of section 3(2) of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 shall have effect in relation to that period as if it were a certificate issued for the purposes of section 8(3) of this Act. | |
(6) Sections 14 and 15 of this Act shall have effect as if references to interception warrants and to section 8(3) certificates included references, respectively, to warrants under section 2 of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 and to certificates under section 3(2) of that Act; and references in sections 14 and 15 of this Act to intercepted or certified material shall be construed accordingly. | |
Short title, commencement and extent. | 73. - (1) This Act may be cited as the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. |
(2) The provisions of this Act, other than this section, shall come into force on such day as the Secretary of State may by order appoint; and different days may be appointed under this subsection for different purposes. | |
(3) Part II of this Act does not extend to Scotland except so far as it makes provision for, or in relation to, the authorisation of any conduct in Scotland- | |
| |
| |
| |
(4) The public authorities referred to in subsection (3) are- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(5) This Act extends to Northern Ireland. |
S C H E D U L E S | |
|
SCHEDULE 1 |
PERSONS HAVING THE APPROPRIATE PERMISSION | |
Requirement that appropriate permission is granted by a judge | |
1. - (1) Subject to the following provisions of this Schedule, a person has the appropriate permission in relation to any protected information if, and only if, written permission for the giving of section 46 notices in relation to that information has been granted- | |
| |
| |
| |
(2) Nothing in paragraphs 2 to 5 of this Schedule providing for the manner in which a person may be granted the appropriate permission in relation to any protected information without a grant under this paragraph shall be construed as requiring any further permission to be obtained in a case in which permission has been granted under this paragraph. | |
Data obtained under warrant etc. | |
2. - (1) This paragraph applies in the case of protected information falling within section 46(1)(a), (b) or (c) where the statutory power in question is one exercised, or to be exercised, in accordance with- | |
| |
| |
(2) Subject to sub-paragraphs (3) to (5) and paragraph 6(1), a person has the appropriate permission in relation to that protected information (without any grant of permission under paragraph 1) if- | |
| |
| |
(3) Only persons holding office under the Crown, the police and customs and excise shall be capable of having the appropriate permission in relation to protected information obtained, or to be obtained, under a warrant issued by the Secretary of State. | |
(4) Only a person who- | |
| |
| |
shall be capable of having the appropriate permission in relation to protected information obtained, or to be obtained, under a warrant issued by a person holding judicial office. | |
(5) Only the police and the customs and excise shall be capable of having the appropriate permission in relation to protected information obtained, or to be obtained, under an authorisation under Part III of the Police Act 1997. | |
(6) In this paragraph "the relevant authority"- | |
| |
| |
| |
(7) Section 94 of the Police Act 1997 (power of other persons to grant authorisations in urgent cases) shall apply in relation to- | |
| |
| |
as it applies in relation to an application for an authorisation under section 93 of that Act and the powers of such an officer under that section. | |
(8) References in this paragraph to a person holding judicial office are references to- | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(9) Protected information that comes into a person's possession by means of the exercise of any statutory power which- | |
| |
| |
shall not be taken, by reason only of the warrant required for the exercise of the power mentioned in paragraph (b), to be information in the case of which this paragraph applies. | |
Data obtained by the intelligence services under statute but without a warrant | |
3. - (1) This paragraph applies in the case of protected information falling within section 46(1)(a), (b) or (c) which- | |
| |
| |
(2) Subject to paragraph 6(1), a person has the appropriate permission in relation to that protected information (without any grant of permission under paragraph 1) if written permission for the giving of section 46 notices in relation to that information has been granted by the Secretary of State. | |
(3) Sub-paragraph (2) applies where the protected information is in the possession, or (as the case may be) is likely to come into the possession, of both- | |
| |
| |
as if a grant of permission under paragraph 1 were unnecessary only where the application to the Secretary of State for permission under that sub-paragraph is made by or on behalf of a member of one of the intelligence services. | |
Data obtained under statute by other persons but without a warrant | |
4. - (1) This paragraph applies- | |
| |
| |
(2) Subject to paragraph 6, where- | |
| |
| |
| |
the police, the customs and excise or, as the case may be, members of Her Majesty's forces have the appropriate permission in relation to the protected information, without any grant of permission under paragraph 1. | |
(3) In any other case a person shall not have the appropriate permission by virtue of a grant of permission under paragraph 1 unless he is a person falling within sub-paragraph (4). | |
(4) A person falls within this sub-paragraph if, as the case may be- | |
| |
| |
| |
Data obtained without the exercise of statutory powers | |
5. - (1) This paragraph applies in the case of protected information falling within section 46(1)(e). | |
(2) Subject to paragraph 6, a person has the appropriate permission in relation to that protected information (without any grant of permission under paragraph 1) if- | |
| |
| |
(3) Sub-paragraph (2) applies where the protected information is in the possession, or (as the case may be) is likely to come into the possession, of both- | |
| |
| |
as if a grant of permission under paragraph 1 were unnecessary only where the application to the Secretary of State for permission under that sub-paragraph is made by or on behalf of a member of one of the intelligence services. | |
General requirements relating to the appropriate permission | |
6. - (1) A person does not have the appropriate permission in relation to any protected information unless he is either- | |
| |
| |
(2) Subject to sub-paragraph (3), a constable does not by virtue of paragraph 1, 4 or 5 have the appropriate permission in relation to any protected information unless- | |
| |
| |
(3) In the case of protected information that has come into the police's possession by means of the exercise of powers conferred by- | |
| |
| |
the permission required by sub-paragraph (2) shall not be granted by any person below the rank mentioned in section 42(4) of that Act of 2000 or, as the case may be, section 13A(1) of that Act of 1989. | |
(4) A person commissioned by the Commissioners of Customs and Excise does not by virtue of paragraph 1, 4 or 5 have the appropriate permission in relation to any protected information unless permission to give a section 46 notice in relation to that information has been granted- | |
| |
| |
(5) A member of Her Majesty's forces does not by virtue of paragraph 1, 4 or 5 have the appropriate permission in relation to any protected information unless- | |
| |
| |
Duration of permission | |
7. - (1) A permission granted by any person under any provision of this Schedule shall not entitle any person to give a section 46 notice at any time after the permission has ceased to have effect. | |
(2) Such a permission, once granted, shall continue to have effect (notwithstanding the cancellation, expiry or other discharge of any warrant or authorisation in which it is contained or to which it relates) until such time (if any) as it- | |
| |
| |
Formalities for permissions granted by the Secretary of State | |
8. A permission for the purposes of any provision of this Schedule shall not be granted by the Secretary of State except- | |
| |
|
|
SCHEDULE 2 | ||
THE TRIBUNAL | |||
Membership of the Tribunal | |||
1. - (1) A person shall not be appointed as a member of the Tribunal unless he is- | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
(2) Subject to the following provisions of this paragraph, the members of the Tribunal shall hold office during good behaviour. | |||
(3) A member of the Tribunal shall vacate office at the end of the period of five years beginning with the day of his appointment, but shall be eligible for reappointment. | |||
(4) A member of the Tribunal may be relieved of office by Her Majesty at his own request. | |||
(5) A member of the Tribunal may be removed from office by Her Majesty on an Address presented to Her by both Houses of Parliament. | |||
President and Vice-President | |||
2. - (1) Her Majesty may by Letters Patent appoint as President or Vice-President of the Tribunal a person who is, or by virtue of those Letters will be, a member of the Tribunal. | |||
(2) A person shall not be appointed President of the Tribunal unless he holds or has held a high judicial office (within the meaning of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1876). | |||
(3) If at any time- | |||
| |||
| |||
the Vice-President shall carry out those functions. | |||
(4) A person shall cease to be President or Vice-President of the Tribunal if he ceases to be a member of the Tribunal. | |||
Members of the Tribunal with special responsibilities | |||
3. - (1) The President of the Tribunal shall designate one or more members of the Tribunal as the member or members having responsibilities in relation to matters involving the intelligence services. | |||
(2) It shall be the duty of the President of the Tribunal, in exercising any power conferred on him by rules under section 60 to allocate the members of the Tribunal who are to consider or hear any complaint, proceedings, reference or preliminary or incidental matter, to exercise that power in a case in which the complaint, proceedings or reference relates to, or to a matter involving- | |||
| |||
| |||
in such manner as secures that the allocated members consist of, or include, one or more of the members for the time being designated under sub-paragraph (1). | |||
Salaries and expenses | |||
4. - (1) The Secretary of State shall pay to the members of the Tribunal out of money provided by Parliament such remuneration and allowances as he may with the approval of the Treasury determine. | |||
(2) Such expenses of the Tribunal as the Secretary of State may with the approval of the Treasury determine shall be defrayed by him out of money provided by Parliament. | |||
Officers | |||
5. - (1) The Secretary of State may, after consultation with the Tribunal and with the approval of the Treasury as to numbers, provide the Tribunal with such officers as he thinks necessary for the proper discharge of their functions. | |||
(2) The Tribunal may authorise any officer provided under this paragraph to obtain any documents or information on the Tribunal's behalf. | |||
Parliamentary disqualification | |||
6. In Part II of Schedule 1 to the House of Commons Disqualification Act 1975 and in Part II of Schedule 1 to the Northern Ireland Assembly Disqualification Act 1975 (bodies whose members are disqualified) there shall be inserted (at the appropriate places) the following entry- | |||
|
|
SCHEDULE 3 | ||||||||||||||||
CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS | |||||||||||||||||
The Post Office Act 1953 (c. 36) | |||||||||||||||||
1. In section 58(1) of the Post Office Act 1953 (opening or delaying of postal packets by officers of Post Office), after "the Interception of Communications Act 1985" there shall be inserted "or under the authority of an interception warrant under section 5 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000". | |||||||||||||||||
The Post Office Act 1969 (c. 48) | |||||||||||||||||
2. In paragraph 1(1) of Schedule 5 to the Post Office Act 1969 (repair of minor deficiencies in certain Acts), for the words from "in obedience" to the end of the sub-paragraph there shall be substituted "under the authority of an interception warrant under section 5 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, under section 11(9) of that Act or in pursuance of a requirement imposed by the Interception of Communications Commissioner under section 54(1) of that Act or imposed by section 59(6) of that Act or by or in accordance with any rules under section 60 of that Act. | |||||||||||||||||
The Telecommunications Act 1984 (c. 12) | |||||||||||||||||
3. In section 45 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 (offence of disclosing of messages and use of telecommunication system), for subsections (2) and (3) there shall be substituted- | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
The Security Service Act 1989 (c. 5) | |||||||||||||||||
4. - (1) In subsection (3) of section 4 of the Security Service Act 1989 (the Security Service Commissioner), for "the subsequent provisions of this Act" there shall be substituted "the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000". | |||||||||||||||||
(2) After that subsection there shall be inserted- | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
The Official Secrets Act 1989 (c. 6) | |||||||||||||||||
5. In section 4(3)(a) of the Official Secrets Act 1989 (offence of disclosing interception information), after "1985" there shall be inserted "or under the authority of an interception warrant under section 5 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000". | |||||||||||||||||
The Intelligence Services Act 1994 (c. 13) | |||||||||||||||||
6. - (1) In subsection (3) of section 8 of the Intelligence Services Act 1994 (the Intelligence Services Commissioner), for "the subsequent provisions of this Act" there shall be substituted "the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000". | |||||||||||||||||
(2) After that subsection there shall be inserted- | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
The Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (c. 25) | |||||||||||||||||
7. - (1) In each of sections 3(7), 7(6), 8(6) and 9(9) of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (exceptions for interceptions from obligations to make disclosures to the defence), for paragraphs (a) and (b) there shall be substituted "it is material the disclosure of which is prohibited by section 16 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000." | |||||||||||||||||
(2) In section 23(6) of that Act (code of practice not to apply to material intercepted under the Interception of Communications Act 1985), after "1985" there shall be inserted "or under the authority of an interception warrant under section 5 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000". | |||||||||||||||||
The Police Act 1997 (c. 50) | |||||||||||||||||
8. - (1) In section 93(3) of the Police Act 1997 (persons who may make an application to an authorising officer within section 93(5))- | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
(2) In section 94(1) of that Act (circumstances in which authorisations may be given in absence of authorising officer), in paragraph (b), for ",(f), (g) or (h)" there shall be substituted "or (f)", and after that paragraph there shall be inserted "or | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
(3) In section 94(2) of that Act (persons who may act in absence of the authorising officer)- | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
(4) In section 94(3) of that Act (rank of police members of the National Crime Intelligence Squad and National Crime Squad entitled to act), after "(2)(e)" there shall be inserted "or (2)(ea)". | |||||||||||||||||
(5) In section 95 of that Act (authorisations: form and duration etc.)- | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
(6) In section 97 of that Act (authorisations requiring approval), in subsection (6), the words from "(and paragraph 7" onwards shall be omitted, and after that subsection there shall be inserted- | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
(7) In section 103(7) of that Act (quashing authorisations), for the words from "and paragraph 7" onwards there shall be substituted "and subsection (6A) of section 97 shall apply for the purposes of this subsection as it applies for the purposes of subsection (6) of that section." | |||||||||||||||||
(8) In section 105 of that Act (appeals by authorising officers: supplementary), in subsection (1)(a), the word "and" shall be inserted at the end of sub-paragraph (i), and sub-paragraph (iii) and the word "and" immediately preceding it shall be omitted. | |||||||||||||||||
(9) In section 107 of that Act- | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
(10) The subsections inserted after subsection (5) of section 107 of that Act are as follows- | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
The Northern Ireland Act 1998 (c. 47) | |||||||||||||||||
9. In paragraph 17(b) of Schedule 2 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (excepted matters), for "the Interception of Communications Act 1985" there shall be substituted "Chapter I of Part I of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000". | |||||||||||||||||
The Electronic Communications Act 2000 (c. 00) | |||||||||||||||||
10. In section 4(2) of the Electronic Communications Act 2000 (exception to rules restricting disclosure of information obtained under Part I of that Act), for the word "or" at the end of paragraph (e) there shall be substituted- | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
The Terrorism Act 2000 (c. 00) | |||||||||||||||||
11. In paragraph 8(1) of Schedule 3 to the Terrorism Act 2000 (procedure of the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission), for "Section 9(1) of the Interception of Communications Act 1985" there shall be substituted "Section 16(1) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000". | |||||||||||||||||
The Freedom of Information Act 2000 (c. 00) | |||||||||||||||||
12. In section 21(3) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (information supplied by, or relating to, bodies dealing with security matters), after paragraph (d) there shall be inserted- | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
SCHEDULE 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REPEALS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Bill |
|
These notes refer to the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Bill REGULATION OF INVESTIGATORY POWERS BILL
EXPLANATORY NOTESINTRODUCTION1. These explanatory notes relate to the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 9 February 2000. They have been prepared by the Home Office in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament.
2. The notes need to be read in conjunction with the Bill. They are not, and are not meant to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. So where a clause or part of a clause does not seem to require any explanation or comment, none is given.
SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND 3. The main purpose of the Bill is to ensure that the relevant investigatory powers are used in accordance with human rights. These powers are:
4. For each of these powers, the Bill will ensure that the law clearly covers:
5. Not all of these matters need be dealt with in this Bill - in many cases existing legislation already covers the ground. The Bill will work in conjunction with existing legislation, in particular the Intelligence Services Act 1994, the Police Act 1997 and the Human Rights Act 1998.
OVERVIEW6. The Bill is in five parts.
Interception of Communications and the Acquisition and Disclosure of Communications Data7. The existing arrangements for the interception of communications are established in the Interception of Communications Act 1985. Significant changes to that Act were proposed in the Consultation Paper "Interception of Communications in the United Kingdom" (CM 4368) published on 22 June 1999. A summary of the responses, along with copies of responses, is available at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/oicd/conslist2.htm. 8. This Bill repeals the 1985 Act and provides for a new regime for the interception of communications incorporating the changes proposed in the consultation paper. These changes go beyond what is strictly required for human rights purposes and provide also for the changed nature of the communications industry since 1985. 9. The provisions also implement Article 5 of Council Directive 97/66 of 15 December 1997, known as the "Telecommunications Data Protection Directive", which requires member states to safeguard the confidentiality of communications.
Surveillance and Covert Human Intelligence Sources10. This Part provides a statutory basis for authorisation and use by the security and intelligence agencies, law enforcement and other public authorities of covert surveillance, agents, informants and undercover officers. It will regulate the use of these techniques and safeguard the public from unnecessary invasions of their privacy.
Investigation of Electronic Data Protected by Encryption etc11. This Part contains provisions to maintain the effectiveness of existing law enforcement powers in the face of increasing criminal use of encryption. Specifically, it will introduce a power to demand access to protected (encrypted) data.
12. The first consultation on this subject was undertaken by the previous administration in March 1997. A broader consultation "Building Confidence in Electronic Commerce: A Consultation Document was launched on 5 March 1999 (URN 99/642). Finally, provisions very similar to these were published as Part III of the draft Electronic Communications Bill issued for consultation on 23 July 1999 (CM 4419).
Scrutiny of Investigatory Powers and Codes of Practice13. This Part ensures that there will be independent judicial oversight of powers where necessary.
14. It also establishes a Tribunal as a means of redress for those who wish to complain about the use of the powers.
15. Finally, it provides for the Secretary of State to issue Codes of Practice covering the use of the powers covered by the Bill.
Miscellaneous and Supplemental16. This Part makes minor amendments to Part III of the Police Act 1997 in the light of operational experience and extends those provisions to the Ministry of Defence Police, the British Transport Police and the Service Police.
17. Both the Police Act and the Intelligence Services Act 1994 are amended to ensure authority is given for interference with property or wireless telegraphy only where it is proportionate to do so.
COMMENTARY ON CLAUSESClause 1: Unlawful and authorised interception 18. This Clause creates the offences of unlawful interception and a separate tort of unlawful interception, explains the locations and circumstances in which each is applicable, and the circumstances in which interception is lawful.
19. Subsection (1) sets out the circumstances in which interception of a communication being transmitted by a public postal service or public telecommunication system is a criminal offence. The offence is similar to that created by Section 1 of the Interception of Communications Act 1985, which this Bill repeals.
20. Subsection (2) sets out the circumstances in which interception of a communication being transmitted by a private telecommunication system is an offence, and cross refers to subsection (6) where the circumstances in which such interception is not a criminal offence are explained.
21. Subsection (3) creates the tort of unlawful interception on a private telecommunications network, the locations at which the tort applies and the persons who may bring an action under this subsection, namely the sender, recipient or intended recipient. For example, where an employee believes that their employer has unlawfully intercepted a telephone conversation with a third party, either the employee or the third party may sue the employer. Clause 4(2) outlines circumstances in which interception by an employer may be lawful.
22. Subsection (4) applies to international agreements on mutual assistance in connection with the interception of communications which are designated under this subsection by an order made by the Secretary of State (negative resolution, see Clause 68). This will enable the United Kingdom to comply with the interception provisions in the draft Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union. Although no similar agreements are currently under negotiation, this subsection will provide flexibility for the future.
23. In respect of agreements designated by this order, this subsection places the Secretary of State under a duty to ensure that no request for mutual assistance to intercept communications is made unless it has lawful authority in accordance with subsection (5). In practice, for the purposes of the draft Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, this will require the Secretary of State to issue an interception warrant under Clause 5(1)(b) prior to any request for mutual assistance.
"International mutual assistance agreement" is defined in Clause 1924. Subsection (5) explains the circumstances in which interception of communications is lawful, and where the offences and the tort created in subsections (1), (2) and (3) do not therefore apply. These are where the interception is not authorised by an interception warrant yet falls into one of the exceptions described in Clauses 3 or 4 (for example where all parties to the communication consent to the interception); where an interception warrant is in existence; or where an existing statutory power is used in order to obtain stored communications. In the latter case, this covers circumstances such as where a person has been arrested in possession of a pager, and the police have reason to believe that the messages sent previously to that pager may be of assistance in the case. In this case they would be able to apply to seek from a circuit judge an order under Schedule 1 to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 for the stored data to be produced.25. Subsection (6) cross refers to subsection (2) and explains the circumstances in which interception of communications activity may fall outside the scope of the criminal offence but within that of the civil tort. Essentially, it allows a person with a right to control a private telecommunication network to intercept on their own network without committing an offence. Examples of this type of activity are an individual using a second handset in a house to monitor a telephone call, and a large company in the financial sector routinely recording calls from the public in order to retain a record of transactions. 26. Subsection (7) specifies the maximum penalties to which a person who is found guilty of the criminal offence of unlawful interception may be sentenced; if he is found guilty in a Magistrates' Court he may be fined up to the statutory maximum (currently £5000); in the Crown Court he may be imprisoned for a period up to two years, or may be fined, or both. There is no upper limit to a fine on conviction in the Crown Court.
Clause 2: Meaning and location of "interception" etc27. This Clause sets out the definitions of telecommunications and postal services and systems relevant to the Bill, and assists in the interpretation of interception and other related matters.
28. Subsection (2) outlines the cases in which an interception of a communication takes place. This is relevant to the criminal offence and the tort in Clause 1; and to the issuing of a warrant by the Secretary of State which authorises or requires interception in Clause 5. The definition only applies to interception of communications on telecommunication systems.
"Wireless telegraphy" and "apparatus" are defined in Clause 71.29. Subsection (4) explains the phrase "in the United Kingdom" in Clause 1(1), (2) and (3). Either (a) or (b) must apply for the offence in 1(2) to occur. 30. Subsection (5) excludes from the definition of interception in subsection (2) any conduct which relates only to the communications data comprised in or attached to a communication (expanded in subsection (9)), or which relates only to so much of the content of the communication as is necessary in order to identify this communications data.31. Subsection (7) expands the phrase "while being transmitted", which is used in the tail of subsection (2). The times when a communication is taken to be in the course of its transmission include any time when it is stored on the system for the intended recipient to collect or access. This means that an interception takes place, for example, where an electronic mail message stored on a web-based service provider is disclosed to someone other than the sender or intended recipient, or where a pager message waiting to be collected is so disclosed. Provision is made for such disclosures in Clause 1(5)(c). 32. Subsection (9) ensures that the references to data being attached to a communication in subsection (5) include data which may not be transmitted simultaneously with the contents of that communication; for example, the data which identifies the number of the person making a telephone call (the calling line identifier).
Clause 3: Lawful interception without an interception warrant33. This Clause authorises certain kinds of interception without the need for a warrant under Clause 5, namely where one or more parties to a communication have consented to the interception, conduct is in relation to the provision or operation of services, or conduct takes place with the authority of the Secretary of State in relation to the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949.
34. Subsection (1) authorises interception where both the sender and the intended recipient of a communication have consented to its interception. This situation applies to the overt use of a telephone answering machine, for example.
35. Subsection (2) authorises interception where:
36. This situation might arise where a kidnapper is telephoning relatives of a hostage, and the police wish to record the call for the purpose of preventing or detecting serious crime.
37. Subsection (3) authorises interception where it takes place for service provision or operation purposes, or where any enactment relating to the use of a service is to be enforced. This might occur, for example, where the postal provider needs to open a postal item to determine the address of the sender because the recipient's address is unknown.
38. Subsection (4) authorises interception where it is authorised by a designated person and is undertaken for purposes connected with certain parts of the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949. Section 5 of that Act, as amended by Clause 64, makes provision for interception of wireless telegraphy under the Secretary of State's authority.
Clause 4: Power to provide for lawful interception39. This Clause lists the cases where a power may be taken to provide for lawful interception without the need for a warrant under Clause 5: under an international mutual assistance agreement; under regulations made by the Secretary of State to permit certain kinds of interception in the course of lawful business practice; under prison rules; and in hospital premises where high security psychiatric services are provided.
40. Subsection (1) enables the Secretary of State to make regulations specifying the conditions under which communication service providers may be authorised to use telecommunications systems located in the United Kingdom to intercept the communications of subjects on the territory of another country in accordance with the law of that country. This subsection applies only where the subject of the interception is in the country whose competent authorities issued the interception warrant. The inclusion of the phrase "or who the interceptor has reasonable grounds for believing is in a country or territory outside the United Kingdom" reflects the fact that it will not always be possible to be certain about the precise location of the interception subject. 41. In practice, the "interceptor" is likely to be a communication service provider located in the UK which is either providing a public telecommunications service to another country or is in a business relationship with another communication service provider providing such a service. 42. This subsection will allow the United Kingdom to comply with Article 17 of the draft Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union. This Article, as currently drafted, is intended to allow operators of satellite communications systems to use a ground station in one Member State to facilitate interception using a "service provider" (in practice, a communications service provider which is in a business relationship with the satellite operator) located in another Member State. The "service provider" and the subject of interception are required to be in the same Member State.
43. Subsection (2) makes provision for the Secretary of State to make regulations describing the kinds of interception which it is lawful to carry out in the course of the carrying on of a business. Article 5 of Directive 97/66/EC (the Telecommunications Data Protection Directive) exempts from its prohibition on interception:
44. Subsection (4) makes reference to prison rules. Sections 47 and 39 of the respective Acts provide for the Secretary of State to make rules for the regulation and management of prisons and similar institutions, and for the classification, treatment, employment, discipline and control of people detained in them. The rules must, by virtue of section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, be compatible with the Convention rights.
45. Subsection (5) makes reference to directions under section 17 of the National Health Service Act 1977. Under section 4 of that Act the Secretary of State has a statutory duty to provide hospital services for persons who are liable to be detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 and in his opinion require treatment under conditions of high security on account of their dangerous, violent or criminal propensities. Under section 17 the Secretary of State may give directions to NHS bodies providing high security psychiatric services about their exercise of any functions. The directions must be compatible with Convention rights.
Clause 5: Interception with a warrant46. This clause allows for interception to be carried out when an interception warrant has been issued by the Secretary of State and sets out the grounds on which a warrant may be issued. For "addressed", see clause 7(3).
47. Subsection (1)(a) authorises the interception of communications sent by means of a postal service or telecommunications system.
48. Subsection (1)(b) allows the Secretary of State to issue an interception warrant for the purpose of making a request for assistance under an international mutual assistance agreement designated under Clause 1(4).
49. Subsection (1)(c) allows the Secretary of State to issue an interception warrant for the purpose of complying with a request for assistance under an international mutual assistance agreement designated under Clause 1(4).
50. Subsection (1)(d) allows for the disclosure of intercepted material and related communications data in a manner described by the warrant.
51. Subsection (2) requires that the Secretary of State may not issue an interception warrant unless he is satisfied that the warrant is necessary on grounds set out in subsection (3). Subsection (2)(b) introduces a proportionality test. Proportionality, under Convention case-law, is an essential part of any justification of conduct which interferes with an Article 8 right to privacy. 52. Subsection (3) sets out the grounds on which the Secretary of State may issue warrants. He may not do so unless he considers that the warrant is necessary on one of those grounds. It would not therefore be sufficient for him to consider that a warrant might be useful in supplementing other material, or that the information that it could produce could be interesting. The word 'necessary' reflects the wording of Article 8 of the Convention - "necessary in a democratic society".
53. Subsection (3)(a) "in the interests of national security" is the term used in Article 8 of the Convention. "National security" is not defined in the Bill, as it is not in any other legislation in which it is used.
54. Subsection (3)(b) "for the purpose of preventing or detecting serious crime". This reflects the provision in Article 8 "for the prevention of disorder and crime", but is qualified by the word "serious".
55. Subsection (3)(c) "for the purpose of safeguarding the economic well-being of the United Kingdom" - this provision should be read in conjunction with Clause 5(5) which introduces an important limitation on its effect. Under Clause 5(5) the Secretary of State is prevented from considering a warrant necessary under Clause 5(3)(c) unless the information to be acquired under it is information relating to acts or intentions of persons outside the British Islands. A warrant could not therefore properly be issued in relation to purely domestic events. As with the other purposes for which interception is permitted, Clause 5(3)(c) closely reflects the wording of Article 8 of the Convention, though the term in Article 8 is understood to have a broader meaning and would include, for example, the protection of tax revenues. The limitation imposed in 5(5) is not found in the Convention.
56. Subsection (3)(d) ensures that the Secretary of State will not issue an interception warrant for the purpose of an international mutual assistance agreement designated under Clause 1(4) unless he is satisfied that the circumstances are equivalent to those in which he would issue a warrant for the prevention or detection of serious crime.
57. Subsection (4) adds a further requirement upon the Secretary of State, in addition to those contained within subsections (2) and (3).
58. Subsection (6)(a) provides for the interception of such other communications (if any) as it is necessary to intercept in order to intercept the communications authorised by the warrant. This provides for situations where other communications are unavoidably intercepted in the course of intercepting the warranted communications.
59. Subsection (6)(b) allows for related communications data to be obtained during the course of interception. For example, this could cover the actions of a provider of communications services in effecting the requirements of a warrant where the intercepted material comprises both communications and related communications data.
60. Subsection (6)(c) allows for assistance in giving effect to the warrant to be provided to a person to whom the warrant is addressed; for example, by a person listed in Clause 11(4).
Clause 6: Application for issue of interception warrants61. Clause 6 describes the persons who may apply for warrants.
Clause 7: Issue of warrants62. Clause 7 describes the persons who may sign interception warrants and the circumstances in which they may do so.
63. The combined effect of subsections (1) and (2) is that the warrant must be signed by the Secretary of State unless the case is either urgent or the purpose is to comply with a request for mutual assistance where the subject of the interception and the competent authority making the request are outside the United Kingdom.
64. In urgent cases a warrant may be signed by a senior official. The procedure in urgent cases has three elements:
65. Thus, even where the urgency procedure applies, the Secretary of State must have given personal consideration to the application in order to give instructions to a senior official for the signing of that particular warrant, which will be limited in duration to five working days.
66. Subsection (2)(b) allows an interception warrant to be issued under the hand of a senior official for the purpose of complying with a request for mutual assistance under an international mutual assistance agreement (designated under Clause 1(4)) in circumstances in which the subject of the interception and the competent authority making the request are outside the United Kingdom.
67. This will allow the United Kingdom to comply with the requirements of Article 16 of the draft Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. Article 16 includes the situation where the United Kingdom is requested to issue an interception warrant to the operator of a satellite ground station in the United Kingdom for the purpose of intercepting a satellite telephone being used on the territory of another Member State. Article 16 enables such warrants to be issued by the requested Member State (in this case, the United Kingdom) "without further formality" provided the competent authorities of the requesting Member State have already issued an interception order against the subject of interception. Since no decision is being made on the merits of the case, and the purpose of the warrant is solely to require the satellite operator to provide technical assistance to the other Member State, it is considered appropriate for these warrants to be issued by senior officials rather than the Secretary of State.
68. Subsection (3) specifies to whom the warrant must be addressed (see list in Clause 6(2)) and that in the case of a warrant under the hand of a senior official it contains one of the statements in subsection (4). The statement in subsection (4)(a) relates to urgent cases and is explained above.
69. Subsection (4)(b) applies only in cases where the warrant is issued in connection with a request made under an international mutual assistance agreement. It ensures, in conjunction with subsection (5), that a statement of the purpose of the warrant is recorded, including the fact that it appears, at the time of the issue of the warrant, that the interception subject is outside the United Kingdom.
Clause 8: Contents of warrant70. This Clause describes the two different forms which a warrant may take.
71. Subsections (1)(a) and (b) require that either the person or the set of premises to be intercepted is named or described on the face of the warrant.
72. Subsection (2) requires that a warrant must include one or more schedules setting out how the communications from or intended for the person described in the warrant, or originating on or intended for transmission to the premises named in the warrant, are to be identified.
73. Subsection (3) describes a second form which warrants may take. It applies if conditions in subsections (3)(a) and (b), and (4)(a) or (b) are met.
74. Subsection (3)(a) confines the conduct authorised or required by the warrant to conduct falling within subsection (4).
75. Subsection (3)(b) requires that at the time when the Secretary of State issues the warrant there must be in existence a certificate certifying the description of intercepted material the examination of which he considers necessary as is mentioned in clause 5(3)(a), (b) or (c) - namely the purposes for the issue of warrants. The effect of this subsection is to require the Secretary of State to authorise a certificate describing the intercepted material which falls properly within the purpose and may therefore be read, looked at or listened to by any person. No other intercepted material, though the communications are lawfully intercepted, may be so examined. The material authorised for examination is therefore fully subject to Ministerial control.
76. Subsection (4)(a) covers conduct that consists in the interception of communications in the course of their transmission by a telecommunications system. The effect of this is to limit warrants under this provision to telecommunications, and to exclude postal items. These telecommunications must also be external communications, i.e. sent or received outside the British Islands.
77. Subsection (4)(b) covers conduct authorised by an interception warrant by Clause 5(6). See Explanatory Notes for Clause 5(6)(a) to (c).
78. Subsection (5) requires a certificate to be issued under the hand of the Secretary of State. The control exercised through the certificate has therefore to be a personal Ministerial one. There is no provision for delegation of this power to officials, even in urgent cases.
|
Clause 9: Duration, cancellation and renewal of warrants.79. Clause 9 provides for the issue, duration and renewal of warrants.
80. Subsection (1)(a) states that a warrant ceases to have effect at the end of the relevant period unless renewed under the power in subsection (1)(b). A renewal instrument must be issued under the hand of the Secretary of State unless the warrant was issued under Clause 7(2)(b), in which case the renewal instrument may be issued by a senior official. Clause 7(2)(b) applies to cases in which the warrant is issued to comply with a request for mutual assistance where the subject of interception or the relevant premises and the competent authority making the request are outside the United Kingdom.
81. Subsection (2) adds a condition that the Secretary of State may only renew a warrant under subsection (1) if he considers that the warrant continues to be necessary as mentioned in Clause 5(3) (in the interests of national security, for the purpose of preventing or detecting serious crime, for the purpose of safeguarding the economic well-being of the UK or for the purpose, in circumstances appearing to the Secretary of State to be equivalent to those in which he would issue a warrant by virtue of paragraph (b), of giving effect to the provisions of any international mutual assistance agreement).
82. Subsection (3) requires the Secretary of State to cancel a warrant at any time if he considers that it is no longer necessary as mentioned in Clause 5(3).
83. Subsection (4) requires the Secretary of State to cancel a warrant where the warrant or renewal instrument was issued under the hand of a senior official on the basis that the subject of the interception was outside the United Kingdom, but the subject is now in the United Kingdom. For the interception to continue in such circumstances, a new warrant will need to be issued by the Secretary of State himself.
84. Subsection (5) applies to renewal instruments issued under the hand of a senior official for the purpose of renewing a warrant issued to comply with a request for mutual assistance where the subject of interception and the competent authority making the request are outside the United Kingdom. In such cases, the renewal instrument must contain a statement that the interception subject or the premises to which the interception relates are outside the United Kingdom.
85. Subsection (6)(a) applies to warrants issued under the urgency procedure in 7(2)(a). Such warrants last for a maximum of five working days following the day of the warrant's issue. Thus a warrant issued in this way at any time on day one will expire at midnight on the fifth working day after day one. If renewed under the hand of the Secretary of State within five working days a warrant initially issued under the urgency procedure then falls within subsection (6)(c) and is valid for three months beginning with the day of the renewal.
86. Under subsection (6)(b) the relevant period is six months, beginning with the day of the warrant's renewal. The result of this is that warrants the renewal of which is considered necessary as mentioned in section 5(3)(a) (in the interests of national security) or (c) (for the purpose of safeguarding the economic well-being of the UK) lapse unless renewed by the Secretary of State within a period of six months.
87. Under subsection (6)(c) the relevant period is three months beginning with the day of the warrant's issue or, in the case of a warrant that has been renewed, of its latest renewal. The effect of this is that all new warrants, and all warrants the renewal of which is considered necessary as mentioned in section 5(3)(b) (for the purpose of preventing or detecting serious crime), are valid for three months from the day of the warrant's issue or renewal.
Clause 10: Modification of warrants and certificates88. Clause 10 sets out the circumstances in which warrants and certificates may be modified and by whom this may be done.
89. Subsection (1)(a) gives the Secretary of State the power to modify the provisions of an interception warrant.
90. Subsection (1)(b) gives the Secretary of State the power to modify the description of interception material specified in a Clause 8(3) certificate so as to include any material the examination of which he considers necessary for a purpose mentioned in Clause 5(3)(a), (b) or (c) (in the interests of national security, for the purpose of preventing or detecting serious crime, for the purpose of safeguarding the economic well-being of the UK).
91. Subsection (2) requires the Secretary of State to modify a schedule if at any time he considers that any factor in the schedule is no longer relevant for identifying communications from, or intended for, the person named or described in the warrant or the communications originating on or intended for transmission to the premises so named or described. The modification is to take the form of the deletion of the factor in question. This provision is the modification equivalent of the cancellation provision in Clause 9(3).
92. Subsection (3) requires the Secretary of State to modify the description in a certificate if at any time he considers that it includes material the examination of which is no longer necessary for the purposes mentioned in paragraphs 5(3)(a) to (c). The modification is to take the form of the exclusion of the material in question.
93. Subsection (4) allows only the Secretary of State or a senior official to modify a warrant or certificate subject to subsections (5) and (6).
94. By subsection (5), a senior official may only modify the unscheduled parts (explained in subsection (10) below) of an interception warrant in an urgent case where the official is expressly authorised by the Secretary of State himself to make the modification and a statement of that fact is on the modifying instrument. This is the same as the urgency procedure for the issue of warrants.
95. The restriction in subsection (5) does not apply to the scheduled parts of a warrant, which may therefore be modified without each modification being referred personally to the Secretary of State. Such modifications shall be valid for five working days - see subsection (9). But subsection (6) restricts the senior officials who may modify the scheduled parts of a warrant by prohibiting those listed in Clause 6(2) or their subordinates from making modifications under this provision. The intention is that this function will only be exercised by senior officials in the department of a Secretary of State.
96. Subsection (7) requires that a senior official may only modify a section 8(3) certificate in an urgent case where the official is expressly authorised by the provisions contained in the certificate to modify the certificate on the Secretary of State's behalf or the Secretary of State has expressly authorised the modification and a statement of that fact is on the modifying instrument. Again such modifications shall be valid for five working days - see subsection (9).
97. Subsection (8) is a separate power to that provided by subsection (4). It permits the persons listed in Clause 6(2) or any of their subordinates, where they are expressly authorised by the warrant, to make urgent modifications to the scheduled parts of an interception warrant. Again such modifications shall be valid for five working days - see subsection (9).
98. Subsection (10) explains the meaning of the term "scheduled parts of an interception warrant".
Clause 11: Implementation of warrants99. This Clause addresses the question of how an interception warrant may be implemented once it has been authorised, and the role of different people within this process.
100. Subsection (1) allows the interception to be carried out either by the person to whom the warrant is addressed (ie where it is technically feasible, by the intercepting agency itself), or by other persons providing assistance in the implementation.
101. Subsection (2). Where an intercepting agency either requires or requests another person to assist it in implementing an interception, it is likely that the person providing assistance will wish to be satisfied that there is an interception warrant in existence to provide legal cover for their actions. This subsection provides for this, allowing the intercepting agency to provide either a copy of the warrant or to make arrangements whereby a copy is provided.
102. Subsection (3). Where a copy of a warrant is served upon a person providing assistance in accordance with subsection (2), this subsection allows the intercepting agency to restrict the disclosure of the warrant to just that material which the person providing assistance needs to see in order to satisfy themselves that their actions are authorised. Most commonly this may involve a communications service provider only being shown the front of the warrant (showing the name of the person to be intercepted) and the specific schedule which identifies the communications which they are being asked to provide assistance in intercepting.
103. Subsection (4) states that where a person providing a communications service is required to give assistance in accordance with an interception warrant, they must do everything required of them by the person to whom the warrant is addressed in order to effect the interception, subject to subsection (5).
104. Subsection (5) provides the balance for subsection (4) above by requiring that no unreasonable requests may be made of a person providing a communications service in implementing an interception warrant.
105. Subsection (6) expands upon what "reasonable assistance" could mean for a person providing a communications service, and cross references to Clause 12 (maintenance of intercept capability). It explains that that where such a person has had an obligation to provide an intercept capability imposed upon them, it is reasonable to expect them to be able to provide assistance with an intercept up to the level of the imposed capability.
106. Subsection (7) creates a criminal offence of knowingly failing to comply with a requirement to provide reasonable assistance in implementing an interception warrant. It goes on to specify the maximum penalties which a person who is found guilty of this offence may be sentenced to; if he is found guilty in a Magistrates' Court he may be fined up to the statutory maximum (currently £5000) or imprisoned for up to six months, or both. In a Crown Court he may be imprisoned for a period up to two years, or may be fined (unlimited fine) or both.
107. Subsection (8) also allows the Secretary of State to take civil proceedings against a person who fails to provide reasonable assistance under subsection (4) in order to compel them to provide such assistance by means of, inter alia, an injunction or other appropriate relief.
108. Subsection (9) explains that the term "provision of assistance" includes the actual disclosure of the intercepted material and related communications data to the person to whom the warrant is addressed (or his representative).
Clause 12: Maintenance of interception capability109. This clause provides a power allowing the Secretary of State to impose obligations upon providers of publicly available communication services to maintain a reasonable intercept capability.
110. Subsection (1) provides the mechanism by which the Secretary of State may impose obligations upon persons providing or planning to provide public postal services or public telecommunications services. It requires that the Secretary of State does this through an order (negative resolution, see Clause 68) which lays out the obligations which he believes are reasonable, with the aim of ensuring that providers of publicly available communications are capable of providing assistance with the implementation of interception warrants. The order itself will not impose specific requirements on communication service providers but it will describe in general terms the kind of intercept capability which they may be required to provide.
111. Subsection (2) follows on from subsection (1) above and explains that the Secretary of State is required to issue an individual notice to each provider of public postal services or public telecommunications services describing in much greater detail than the order the precise intercept requirement which he is imposing.
112. Subsection (3) makes clear that requirements imposed by the Secretary of State under subsection (2) must be restricted to requirements ensuring the provision of an intercept capability.
113. Subsection (4) requires persons served with a notice under subsection (2) to comply with it, and goes on to allow the Secretary of State to take civil proceedings against a person who fails to comply with the notice in order to compel them to provide an intercept capability by means of, inter alia, an injunction, or other appropriate relief.
114. Subsection (5) requires the Secretary of State to give a clear time scale within notices issued under subsection (2), explaining how long communication service providers have in order to implement the requirements described in the notice.
115. Subsection (6) requires the Secretary of State to consult with a number of parties prior to making an order. These parties include the persons the order is likely to affect (ie providers of publicly available communications services) and their representatives, and bodies such as OFTEL and the DTI which have statutory functions affecting providers of communication services.
116. Subsection (7) explains that the term "reasonable intercept capability" may include arrangements for disclosure of intercepted material and security arrangements.
117. Subsection (8) explains the meaning of the term "relevant interception warrant" as it applies to this clause.
Clause 13: Grants for interception costs118. This Clause permits, but does not require, the Secretary of State to make contributions towards costs incurred by communications service providers in providing an intercept capability or in the provision of assistance required as a result of the issue of an interception warrant.
Clause 14: General safeguards119. This clause has the effect of restricting the use of intercepted material to the minimum necessary for the authorised purposes. Clause 72(6) contains a transitional provision applying the provisions of Clauses 14 and 15 to warrants and certificates under the 1985 Act.
120. Subsection (1) imposes a duty upon the Secretary of State to ensure that safeguard arrangements are in place to ensure the requirements of this clause and clause 15.
121. Subsection (2) requires that the distribution and disclosure of intercepted material and related communications data are kept to a minimum.
122. Subsection (3) requires that all copies of any intercepted material and related communications data must be destroyed as soon it is no longer necessary to retain it for any of the authorised purposes (see below). This does not impose any obligation to retain material, which may therefore be destroyed earlier in some cases.
123. Subsection (4) defines "authorised purposes", which are the reasons for which intercepted material may be retained rather than being destroyed under subsection (3).
124. Subsections (5) and (6) apply where possession of intercepted material or related communications data has been surrendered to any authorities of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom. Possession may be surrendered in this way where an interception warrant has been issued for the purpose of complying with a request under an international mutual assistance agreement designated under Clause 1(4). For example, where such a request results in the provision of intercept material by the communication service provider to the competent authorities of another country in real-time, the material will not, at any point, be under the control of an intercepting agency in the United Kingdom.
125. For these reasons, the Secretary of State will be required to make such arrangements (if any) corresponding to subsections (2) and (3) as he thinks fit. The Secretary of State will also be required to ensure, to such extent (if any) as he thinks fit, that restrictions are in force preventing the disclosure in any proceedings outside the United Kingdom which could not be made in the United Kingdom by virtue of Clause 16 (the exclusion of intercept material from legal proceedings).
Clause 15: Extra safeguards in the case of certificated warrants126. This Clause creates extra safeguards in addition to those provided in Clause 14, in the case of warrants to which Clause 8(3) certificates apply.127. Subsections (1) and (2) provide the additional safeguards which apply: material intercepted under the authority of a warrant to which a certificate applies should only be examined if it:
129. Subsections (4), (5) and (6) provide two further exceptions where:
Clause 16: Exclusion of matters from legal proceedings131. Clause 16, subject to certain exceptions, excludes evidence, questioning or assertion in legal proceedings likely to reveal the existence or absence of a warrant. A similar provision is contained in section 9 of the Interception of Communications Act 1985, which this Bill repeals.
132. Subsection (1) places a prohibition on the use of intercept material in connection with court proceedings. It does this directly, by stating that the contents of intercepted material and associated communications data may not be disclosed, and indirectly by prohibiting the disclosure of any suggestion that actions under subsection (2) have occurred.
133. Subsection (2) describes the actions which may not be disclosed in connection with court proceedings, including actions by persons named in subsection (3) which would constitute an offence under this Bill or section 1 IOCA.
134. Subsection (3) lists the people referred to in subsection (2)(a). They are people who may be in possession of information about authorised interception. In Clause 16(3)(b) persons holding office under the Crown includes Ministers, Crown Servants, members of the Armed Forces and the police.
135. Subsection (4) gives a definition of "intercepted communication" for this section.
Clause 17: Exceptions to section 16136. Subsection (1) lists the occasions when the prohibition in section 16(1) will not apply.
137. Subsection (2) allows the use in evidence of intercept material in any legal proceedings relating to the fairness or unfairness of a dismissal on the grounds of any conduct constituting an offence under Clause 1(1) or (2), 11(7) or 18 or Section 1 of Interception of Communications Act 1985.
138. Subsection (3) provides for the disclosure of the contents of a communication if the interception was lawful without the need for a warrant by virtue of Clauses 1(5)(c), 3 or 4. For further details of the circumstances in which it is lawful to intercept without a warrant refer to the explanatory notes for clauses 1(5)(c), 3 and 4.
139. Subsection (4) allows the disclosure of any conduct of a person for which he has been convicted of an offence under section 1(1) or (2) 11(7), or 18 of this Act or section 1 of the Interception of Communications Act 1985.
140. Subsection (5) allows the disclosure of the fact and contents of an interception to a person conducting a criminal prosecution. A prosecutor has a duty, recognised in case-law, to ensure that a prosecution is fair. This provision allows the intercepting agency to give the prosecutor access to any intercept material which has not been destroyed so that he can discharge that duty effectively. This subsection further provides that the fact and contents of an interception may also be disclosed to a relevant judge in exceptional circumstances (see subsection (6) below). The subsection allows disclosure to the judge alone.
141. Subsection (6) makes it clear that the judge must be satisfied that the exceptional circumstances of the case make any disclosure under subsection 5(b) essential in the interests of justice.
142. Subsection (7) provides for a relevant judge where he has ordered disclosure under subsection (5)(b) in exceptional circumstances to direct the person conducting the prosecution in any criminal proceedings to make any such admission of fact as that judge may think essential.
143. Subsection (8) makes it clear that a judge cannot order a disclosure if it is in contravention of Clause 16(1).
Clause 18: Offence for unauthorised disclosures144. This clause places a requirement upon specified groups of persons to keep secret all matters relating to warranted interception.
145. Subsection (2) describes the groups of persons upon whom there is a duty to keep secret matters relating to warranted interception. These include:
146. Subsection (3) describes the matters which must be kept secret. In essence these are anything to do with the existence or implementation of a warrant, including the content of the intercepted material and related communications data.
147. Subsection (4) creates the offence of unlawful disclosure and specifies the maximum penalties which a person who is found guilty of the criminal offence of unlawful disclosure may be sentenced to; if he is found guilty in a Magistrates' Court he may be imprisoned for a period up to six months or fined up to the statutory maximum (currently £5000) or both; in a Crown Court he may be imprisoned for a period up to five years, or may be fined (no upper limit), or both.
148. Subsection (5) gives a defence where a person could not reasonably have been expected to take steps to prevent the unlawful disclosure.
149. Subsections (6) and (7) give further defences to the offence of unlawful disclosure and addresses the question of a person consulting their legal adviser about requirements placed upon them under this Bill, and disclosures which their legal adviser may be required to make as a result of such consultation. For example, where a communications service provider is required to provide assistance with the implementation of an interception warrant, the provider may wish to first consult their lawyer. Subsection (6) provides a defence to such a consultation being an unlawful disclosure.
150. Subsection (8) places a limitation on the defences described in subsections (6) and (7), stating that the defences are not valid where a disclosure was made with a view to furthering any criminal purpose.
151. Subsection (9) gives a further defence to the offence of unlawful disclosure, stating that where such a disclosure was authorised in any of the ways described in this subsection this would constitute a defence.
Clause 19152. Clause 19 interprets terms used in this Chapter.
CHAPTER II153. This Chapter provides a legislative framework to cover the requisition, provision and handling of communications data. It explains the duties and responsibilities placed upon each party involved in these processes and creates a system of safeguards, reflecting the requirements of Article 8 of the Convention.
Clause 20: Lawful acquisition and disclosure of communications data154. This Clause explains the scope of this Chapter, the meaning of the term "communications data", and ensures that provision of communications data under these provisions fully meets the requirements of Article 8.
155. Subsection (1) draws a distinction between interception of communications in the course of their transmission, which is activity excluded from this part of the Bill, and conduct involving the obtaining of or disclosure of communications data, which is activity covered by this part of the Bill.
156. Subsections (2) and (3) have the effect of making the provision of communications data under this Chapter lawful. This ensures that there is no criminal or civil liability attached to actions undertaken as a result of a requirement or authorisation under this Chapter.
157. Subsection (4) explains what "communications data" means. In essence, it includes information relating to the use of a communications service but makes clear that this does not include the contents of the communication itself.
|
Clause 21: Obtaining and disclosing communications data.158. This Clause explains the purposes for which communications data may be sought under this Chapter and the arrangements by which such data may be required.
159. Subsection (1) explains that the strict test of "necessity" must be met before any communications data is obtained under this Chapter. The assessment of necessity is one made by a person designated for the purposes of this Chapter (defined in Clause 24(2)).
160. Subsection (2) explains the reasons for which communications data may be required. With the exception of (g), these are the same as the purposes for which directed surveillance and the use of a covert human intelligence source may be permitted by Clauses 27 and 28 of the Bill.
161. Subsections (3) and (4) describe the two ways in which communications data may be obtained. Firstly, subsection (3) provides a means for a designated person to authorise someone within the same relevant public authority (see Clause 24(1)). This provides a legal basis upon which the public authority may collect the communications data themselves. For example, if a private telecommunications operator was technically unable to collect certain communications data, this subsection would provide the authority to allow an investigating body to collect the data themselves.
162. Subsection (4) provides the second way in which communications data may be obtained, where the designated person serves a notice upon the holder of the data, requiring them to comply with the terms of the notice as soon as is reasonably practicable.
163. Subsection (5) introduces a proportionality test. The designated person must not only consider the communications data to be "necessary" (subsection (1)) but must also consider the conduct involved in obtaining the communications data to be "proportionate".
164. Subsection (6) requires a communications service provider in receipt of a notice under subsection (4) above to comply with it as soon as is reasonably practicable.
165. Subsection (7) explains that if a communications service provider fails to provide the required communications data then the Secretary of State may take civil proceedings against them, which may result in the issue of, inter alia, an injunction which would have the effect of compelling the provision of the data.
Clause 22: Form and duration of authorisations and notices166. This clause specifies the way in which authorisations and notices must be completed and their duration.
167. Subsections (1) and (2) explain the format which authorisations and notices must take.
168. Subsection (3) restricts the persons to whom the data may be disclosed to the person giving the notice or another specified person who must be from the same relevant public authority.
169. Subsection (4) explains that disclosure may only be required of data in the possession of, or obtained by the communications service provider during the authorisation period of authorisations and notices, which is set at one month.
170. Subsections (5) and (6) permit an authorisation or notice to be renewed at any period during the month, by following the same procedure as in obtaining a fresh authorisation or notice.
171. Subsection (7) explains that the period for which a renewed authorisation or notice is extant begins at the point at which the notice or authorisation it is renewing expires.
172. Subsection (8) requires the cancellation of a notice as soon as it is clear that the reasons for which it was granted are no longer valid.
Clause 23: Arrangements for payments173. This clause allows for payment arrangements to be made in order to compensate holders of communications data for the costs involved in complying with notices issued under this Chapter.
Clause 24: Interpretation of Chapter II174. This clause defines the terms used in the Chapter dealing with communications data.
175. Subsection (2) explains that the Secretary of State will identify the "persons designated for the purposes of this Chapter" in an order (negative resolution, see Clause 68). Under subsection (3), he may place restrictions on who may act under these provisions and in what circumstances.
PART II: SURVEILLANCE AND COVERT HUMAN INTELLIGENCE SOURCESIntroductory176. This Part of the Bill creates a system of authorisations for various types of surveillance and the conduct and use of covert human intelligence sources. In common with other Parts of the Bill, the provisions themselves do not impose a requirement on public authorities to seek or obtain an authorisation where, under the Bill, one is available (see Clause 70). Nevertheless, the consequences of not obtaining an authorisation under this Part may be, where there is an interference with Article 8 rights and there is no other source of authority, that the action is unlawful by virtue of section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998.
Clause 25: Conduct to which Part II applies177. This clause describes and defines the conduct which can be authorised under this part of the Bill. Three types of activity are covered: "directed surveillance", "intrusive surveillance" and the conduct and use of covert human intelligence sources.
178. "Directed surveillance" is defined in subsection (2) as covert surveillance that is undertaken in relation to a specific investigation in order to obtain information about, or identify, a particular person or to determine who is involved in a matter under investigation. By subsection (8), surveillance will be covert where it is carried out in a manner calculated to ensure that the person or persons subject to the surveillance are unaware that it is or may be taking place. Directed surveillance may also include the interception of communications where there is no interception warrant and where the communication is sent by or is intended for a person who has consented to the interception (Clause 45(4)).
179. "Intrusive surveillance" is defined in subsections (3) to (5) as covert surveillance carried out in relation to anything taking place on residential premises or in any private vehicle. This kind of surveillance may take place by means either of a person or device located inside residential premises or a private vehicle or by means of a device placed outside which consistently provides a product of equivalent quality and detail as a product which would be obtained from a device located inside.
180. For these purposes, a private vehicle is one used primarily for private purposes, for example for family, leisure or domestic purposes (clause 45(1)). Subsection (4) provides that surveillance is not intrusive when the device is one that only provides information about the location of the vehicle (eg a tracking device).
181. Subsection (7) defines a "covert human intelligence source".
Authorisation of surveillance and human intelligence sourcesClause 26: Lawful surveillance etc182. This clause provides that all conduct defined in clause 25 will be lawful, provided it is carried out in accordance with the authorisation to which it relates. Authorised conduct may cover any action taken either in the UK or abroad.
183. Furthermore, there will be no civil liability arising out of conduct which is incidental to the authorised conduct. However, this is only the case where the incidental conduct should not have been separately authorised either under this Bill or under existing legislation.
Clauses 27, 28 and 29: Authorisation of directed surveillance; Authorisation of covert human intelligence sources; and Persons entitled to grant authorisations under sections 27 and 28184. These clauses deal with the scheme of authorisations for directed surveillance and the conduct and use of covert human intelligence sources.
185. Clause 29 provides that the persons entitled to grant such authorisations will be such persons within the relevant public authorities that are designated by order of the Secretary of State. In this respect, the relevant public authorities are:
186. Where an authorisation for directed surveillance or the use or conduct of a covert human intelligence source is combined with a Secretary of State authorisation for intrusive surveillance, the combined authorisation must be issued by the Secretary of State .
187. Police and Customs authorisations may only be granted an application from within the force or authority in question (see clause 31(1) and (2)).
188. Clause 27 and 28 provide that authorisations cannot be granted unless specific criteria are satisfied, namely, that the person granting the authorisation believes that:
189. The specific grounds are that the authorisation is necessary:
190. There is a further criterion in relation to covert human intelligence sources, which is set out in clause 28(5), namely that specific arrangements exist to ensure that, amongst other things, the source is independently managed and supervised and that records are kept of the use made of the source. The responsibility for such tasks falls to specified individuals within the organisation benefiting from the use of the source. As there may be cases where a source carries out activities for more than one organisation, it is provided that only one organisation will be identified as having responsibility for such arrangements and record-keeping.
191. Subsection (3) of Clause 29 provides that the Secretary of State may impose, by order, restrictions on the types of authorisations granted and on the circumstances or purpose for which such authorisations may be granted.
192. Clauses 27(4) and 28(4) set out the conduct that is authorised by the authorisation. Broadly speaking, it covers any conduct that occurs whilst carrying out the specified surveillance or is comprised in the activities involving the specified conduct or use of a covert human intelligence source, provided it is carried out or takes place in the manner and for the purposes described.
INTRUSIVE SURVEILLANCEClause 30: Authorisation of intrusive surveillance
193. This clause deals with authorisations for intrusive surveillance. Such authorisations may only be granted by the Secretary of State (see clauses 39 and 40) and by senior authorising officers as defined in subsection (6). Clauses 31(3) and (4) provide that a senior authorising officer may not grant an authorisation, except on an application by a member of his/her force, Service, Squad or organisation.
194. Again, intrusive surveillance authorisations cannot be granted unless specific criteria are satisfied, namely that, the Secretary of State or senior authorising officer believes that:
195. An additional factor which must be taken into account is that the Secretary of State or senior authorising officer must be satisfied that the information which it is thought necessary to obtain by the authorised conduct could reasonably be obtained by other means.
196. The specific grounds in this case are it is necessary:
Police and customs authorisations197. Clauses 32 to 37 only apply to intrusive surveillance authorisations for investigations carried by the police, NCIS, the National Crime Squad and Customs & Excise. They outline very similar procedures to those set out in part III of the Police Act 1997 (interference with property and wireless telegraphy).
Clause 31: Rules for grant of authorisations198. In the case of a police force, NCIS and the National Crime Squad, subsection (3) restricts an authorisation for intrusive surveillance involving residential premises to being granted only where the premises are within the area of operation of that force, Service or Squad. The areas of operations are defined in subsection (6). For the three service police forces, this is defined in terms of the persons who are subject to "service discipline" which is defined in subsection (7).
Clause 32: Grant of authorisations for intrusive surveillance in the senior officer's absence199. Where an application is made for an intrusive surveillance authorisation and the case is urgent but it is not reasonably practicable for the application to be considered by the "senior authorising officer" (as defined in Clause 30) or his designated deputy, an authorisation may be granted by a person entitled to act in his/her absence. Subsection (4) lists the officers entitled so to act and subsection (5) sets down those officers entitled to act as "designated deputies".
Clause 33: Notification of authorisations for intrusive surveillance200. Where a police or customs intrusive surveillance authorisation is granted, renewed or cancelled, except where it is cancelled under clause 35(3), written notification must be given to an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner as soon as reasonably practicable. Subsection (2) requires that notification to be in accordance with arrangements made by the Chief Surveillance Commissioner and must specify the matters prescribed by order of the Secretary of State. Such a notice will indicate that the authorisation or renewal requires the approval of an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner before it takes effect (see clause 34) or it will state that the case is one of urgency, together with the grounds for that belief.
201. Subsection (4) provides that the ordinary Surveillance Commissioner will, as soon as practicable, scrutinise the notice, which can be transmitted by electronic means, and decide whether or not to approve the authorisation in those case where his approval is required.
Clause 34: Approval required for authorisations for intrusive surveillance to take effect202. Except in urgent cases, authorisations granted for intrusive surveillance will not take effect until they have been approved by an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner and written notice of the Commissioner's decision has been given to the person who granted the authorisation.
203. Where the person who granted the authorisation believes the case to be one of urgency, the authorisation will take effect from the time of grant, provided the appropriate notice is given to the ordinary Surveillance Commissioner, as described in clause 34(3).
204. Subsection (4) provides that an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner shall give his approval only if he is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the authorisation is necessary and that the surveillance is proportionate to what is sought to be achieved.
205. If an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner decides not to approve an authorisation, subsection (5) requires him to make a report of his findings to the "most senior relevant person" (as defined in subsections (6) and (7)). This will be the chief constable or equivalent.
Clause 35: Quashing of police and customs authorisations for intrusive surveillance etc206. This clause gives Surveillance Commissioners the power to quash or cancel an authorisation for intrusive surveillance.
207. Under subsection (2), an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner may quash an authorisation, with effect from the time of the grant of the authorisation or renewal, if he believes that the criteria for authorisation in Clause 30 were not met at the time the authorisation was granted or renewed.
208. Alternatively, he may, under subsection (3) cancel an authorisation if he believes that there are no longer any reasonable grounds for believing that the criteria in Clause 30 are met. In such a case, he may cancel the authorisation from the time that the criteria, in his opinion, ceased to be met.
209. If an authorisation was granted or renewed by way of the urgency procedure, and the ordinary Surveillance Commissioner is not satisfied that, at the time of grant or renewal, there were reasonable grounds for believing the case to be one of urgency, he may quash the authorisation.
210. He may also, under subsections (5) and (6), order the destruction of records, apart from those required for pending civil or criminal procedures. Where an authorisation is cancelled, he may only order the destruction of records from the time the authorisation no longer meets the criteria specified in Clause 30.
211. An order to destroy records does not become operative until after the period allowed for appealing against the decision or the dismissal of such an appeal.
212. Where an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner exercises a power conferred by this clause, he will make a report of his actions, together with his reasons, as soon as reasonably practicable, to the most senior relevant person (usually the chief constable) and to the Chief Surveillance Commissioner.
Clause 36: Appeals against decisions by Surveillance Commissioners213. A senior authorising officer, or a designated deputy or other person granting an intrusive surveillance authorisation in the absence of the senior authorising officer, may appeal to the Chief Surveillance Commissioner against:
214. Subsection (4) provides that the Chief Surveillance Commissioner must allow an appeal if:
215. In relation to appeals against decisions to quash or cancel authorisations, the Chief Surveillance Commissioner may modify the decision if he considers that there were grounds for the action which the Surveillance Commissioner has taken but such action should have taken effect at a different time. In such cases, he may modify the Surveillance Commissioner's decision to that which he considers should have been made.
216. Where an appeal against a decision to quash or cancel an authorisation is allowed, subsection (6) provides that the Chief Surveillance Commissioner shall quash any related order for the destruction of records.
Clause 37: Appeals to the Chief Surveillance Commissioner: supplementary217. Where the Chief Surveillance Commissioner has determined an appeal, subsection (1) requires him to give notice of his determination to:
218. Where the appeal is dismissed, he will report his findings, to the appellant, the ordinary Surveillance Commissioner and to the Prime Minister. Other than this report, he will not give any reasons for his determination.
219. As with section 107 of the Police Act 1997, the Chief Surveillance Commissioner will make an annual report on the discharge of his functions to the Prime Minister and may make a report to him at any other time of any matter relating to those functions (Schedule 3, paragraph 8(9)).
220. Subsection (3) provides that the annual reporting provisions contained in subsections (3) and (4) of the Police Act 1997 also relate to reports made by the Chief Surveillance Commissioner under subsection (2).
OTHER AUTHORISATIONS221. Clauses 39 and 40 still relate to intrusive surveillance authorisations, but deal with those granted by the Secretary of State.
Clause 39: Secretary of State authorisations222. Subsection (1) provides that the Secretary of State shall not grant such authorisations unless an application is made by a member of the intelligence agencies (Security Service, Secret Intelligence Service and GCHQ), an official of the Ministry of Defence, the armed forces, or a specified individual within a public authority designated for this purpose by order of the Secretary of State (subsection (4)). For these purposes, the three service police forces are not treated as members of the armed forces (subsection (5)); instead, their use of intrusive surveillance is regulated, in the same way as other police forces, by Clause 30.
223. The effect of subsection (2) is that authorisations will only be granted to an official of the Ministry of Defence or a member of the Armed Forces, where it is necessary in the interests of national security or for preventing or detecting serious crime.
224. Subsection (4) provides the power for the Secretary of State to impose, by order, restrictions on designated public authorities for the carrying out of intrusive surveillance and on the circumstances in which, or the purposes for which, such authorisations may be granted.
Clause 40: Intelligence services authorisations225. Where the Secretary of State grants an authorisation to one of the intelligence services under this Part (which will be for intrusive surveillance, or intrusive surveillance combined with directed surveillance), the authorisation will take the form of a warrant. This is consistent with section 5 of the Intelligence Services Act 1994.
226. Subsection (2) provides that a single warrant may combine an authorisation for intrusive surveillance with an intelligence services warrant (defined in subsection (6): a property warrant under section 5 of the Intelligence Services Act 1994).
227. In addition to the requirements in clause 30, subsection (3) limits SIS and GCHQ to obtaining a warrant for intrusive surveillance in the British Islands to investigations carried out in the interests of national security or the economic well-being of the UK. Subsections (4) and (5) enable the Security Service to act on behalf of SIS and GCHQ in applying for and granting any authorisation in connection with a function of SIS or GCHQ, provided that the SIS or GCHQ would have the power to act in that way, and provided that it does not relate to the functions of SIS or GCHQ in support of the prevention or detection of serious crime.
Grant, renewal and duration of authorisationsClause 41: General rules about grant, renewal and duration228. This Clause sets out the general rules for authorisations, including their granting, renewal, and duration.
229. Subsection (1) provides that, in urgent cases, an authorising officer may give an oral authorisation. All other authorisations must be in writing.
230. A single authorisation may be given, combining two or more authorisations under this part. When this occurs, the provisions of this Part which relate to one type of activity only shall apply to those parts of the authorisation which authorises that type of activity. Further provisions for combined authorisations are in clause 31(5), 40(2) and 42(6).
231. Oral authorisations and those granted by officers entitled to act in urgent cases in the absence of the authorising officer or his designated deputy will expire after 72 hours, beginning with the time when the grant or renewal of an authorisation takes effect.
232. Except where granted or renewed orally or by an officer entitled to act in urgent cases, authorisations for the use of covert human intelligence sources will last for 12 months, beginning with the day on which the grant or renewal takes effect.
233. In all other cases (except those made under the special provisions for the intelligence services contained in Clause 42), the authorisation will last for 3 months, beginning with the day on which the grant or renewal takes effect.
234. Subsection (4) provides that an authorisation may be renewed at any time before it ceases to have effect by any person entitled to grant a new authorisation of the same type. The same conditions attach to a renewal of surveillance as to the original authorisation. However, before renewal of an authorisation for the use or conduct of a covert human intelligence source, subsection (6) requires there to be a review of the use made of that source, the tasks given to that source and the information so obtained.
Clause 42: Special rules for intelligence services authorisations235. This Clause sets out special provisions in relation to authorisations granted to or by the intelligence services.
236. Under subsection (1), a warrant for intrusive surveillance or a renewal of such a warrant will not be issued except under the hand of the Secretary of State. However, in an urgent case, where the Secretary of State has personally authorised it, a warrant can be signed (but not renewed) by a senior official. This is the same urgency procedure as is provided in Clause 7(2)(a) for interception. Where this has happened, such a warrant will cease to have effect at the end of the second working day following its issue, unless renewed under the hand of the Secretary of State.
237. Subsections (4) and (5) relate to the authorisation of warrants for the intelligence services and for the authorisations and renewal of authorisations for directed surveillance where the authorisation is necessary in the interests of national security or in the interests of the economic well-being of the UK. Such warrants or authorisations last for a period of six months. Where this is a renewal, the period will start on the day when the previous authorisation or warrant would have expired. This is consistent with the provisions of the Intelligence Service Act 1994.
Clause 43: Cancellation of authorisations238. Subsection (1) sets out when the person who granted or renewed an authorisation must cancel it.
239. Subsection (2) sets out who else is responsible for cancelling the authorisation eg the person who would have granted it if it had not been an urgent case or been granted by a deputy. However, an authorising officer's deputy (defined in subsections (6) and (7)) who granted an authorisation is also under a duty to cancel an authorisation in those cases where he would have had the power to act on the authorising officer's behalf.
240. Subsections (4) and (5) provide for the Secretary of State to make regulations setting out how the duty for cancelling authorisations should be performed where the authorising officer is no longer available and on whom such a duty should fall.
Supplemental provision for Part IIClause 44: Power to extend of modify authorisation provisions241. The Secretary of State may, by order, change the types of activities which fall within the categories of intrusive and directed surveillance by providing that a type of directed surveillance will be treated as intrusive surveillance or vice versa. Furthermore, he may, by order, provide that additional types of surveillance, which are not at present defined as directed or intrusive surveillance in Clause 25, will be covered by the Bill and become capable of being authorised under Part II.
|
Clause 45: Interpretation of Part II242. This Clause gives interpretations for the terms used in this part. Amongst other things, it gives an interpretation for "surveillance" and clarifies that this does not include references to:
PART III - INVESTIGATION OF ELECTRONIC DATA PROTECTED BY ENCRYPTION ETCClause 46: Notices requiring disclosure of key243. This Clause introduces a power to enable properly authorised persons (such as members of the law enforcement, security and intelligence agencies) to serve written notices on individuals or bodies requiring the surrender of information (such as a decryption key) to enable them to understand (make intelligible) protected material which they lawfully hold, or are likely to.
244. Subsection (1) limits the information to which this power to serve notices applies. It does so by defining the various means by which the protected information in question has been, or is likely to be, lawfully obtained. By way of illustration, this could be material:
245. Subsection (2) states that persons with the "appropriate permission" (see Schedule 1) may serve a notice demanding that the key be disclosed to make unintelligible data intelligible if there are reasonable grounds for believing:
246. Subsection (4) explains the way in which the notice must be given and what it must state.
247. Subsection (5) specifies the persons to whom the key may be disclosed.
248. Subsection (6) ensures that a key, which has been used solely for the purpose of generating electronic signatures, does not have to be disclosed in response to a notice.
249. The effect of Subsection (7) is to set authorisation levels (described in Schedule 1) for serving a written notice under Clause 46. The level of authority required will vary depending on the power under which the protected material was, or is likely to be, lawfully obtained.
Clause 47: Disclosure of information in place of key250. This Clause provides that a person may, in response to the service of a written notice, provide an intelligible version (plain text) of relevant protected data rather than e.g. a decryption key, unless the person who gave the authorisation to serve the notice, or a person entitled to give such authorisation, has specified that only the disclosure of the key itself is sufficient.
251. This Clause would, for example, allow a company - that might have received an encrypted message from the target of a particular enquiry (e.g. a suspected criminal) - to offer up a intelligible copy of the message rather than any decryption key.
252. Subsection (4) states that a person may only specify that only the disclosure of a key is sufficient if this is believed to be proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by doing so.
Clause 48: Arrangements for payments for key disclosure253. This Clause allows for payment arrangements to be made in order to compensate persons required to disclose information (eg a decryption key) following service of a written notice under Clause 46.
Clause 49: Failure to comply with a notice254. This Clause creates a new offence of failing to comply with the terms of a written notice served under Clause 46. It outlines statutory defences.
255. Subsection (1) states that a person is guilty of an offence if he:
256. Subsections (2) and (3) allow a defence to a person who shows that he did not have the key to the information (or, where appropriate, the information itself) but gave as much information as he had about how the key could be obtained; or that he did what was required of him as soon as was reasonably practicable.
257. Subsection (5) specifies the maximum sentence for the offence of failing to comply with a notice. As regards financial penalties, there is no upper limit to fines set in the Crown Court (on conviction on indictment). In a Magistrates Court (on summary conviction) the maximum fine is £5,000.
Clause 50: Tipping-off258. This Clause creates a new offence where the recipient of a notice (but only one which explicitly contains a secrecy requirement), or a person that becomes aware of it, tips off another that a notice has been served, or reveals its contents. This is to preserve, where necessary, the covert nature of an investigation by, for example, a law enforcement agency. It outlines various statutory defences.
259. Subsection (1) limits this offence to occasions where the notice served explicitly demands secrecy and Subsection (2) places restrictions on the instances when such a requirement may be imposed.
260. Subsection (3) specifies the maximum sentence for the tipping-off offence. On conviction in the Crown Court, the maximum term of imprisonment is five years. The financial penalties are as for the offence set out in Clause 49.
261. Subsection (4) provides a defence where the tipping-off occurred entirely as a result of software designed to give an automatic warning that a key had been compromised and where, in addition, the defendant was unable to stop this from taking place after receiving the notice.
262. Subsections (5) and (6) provide a defence where a disclosure is made to or by a professional legal adviser as part of advice about the effect of the provisions of this part of the Bill given to a client or his representative; or where a disclosure was made by a legal adviser in connection with any proceedings before a court or tribunal.
263. The effect of Subsection (7) is that the protection in Subsections (5) and (6) will not apply where a professional legal adviser tips off a client with a view to furthering any criminal purpose.
264. Subsection (8) provides a statutory defence where the disclosure is authorised by:
265. The effect of Subsection (8) is, for example, to permit persons served with written notices (where authorised) to seek the assistance of another party in order to comply with the terms of the notice (e.g. accessing a key or plain text).
266. Subsection (9) provides a statutory defence for a person told about a notice but not about the fact that there was a requirement for secrecy.
Clause 51: General duties of specified authorities267. This Clause describes the safeguards that must be in place for the protection of any material (e.g. a decryption key) handed over in response to the serving of a notice under this Bill.
268. Subsection (1) ensures that the safeguard requirements apply to all those who may have responsibility for organisations that will handle material provided in response to a written notice. In the case of the security and intelligence agencies for example, this will mean the Secretary of State.
269. Subsection (2) places an onus on those identified to ensure that:
270. Subsection (3) specifies that the material is shared with the minimum number of people possible.
Clause 52: Interpretation of Part III271. This Clause provides for the interpretation of various terms used in Part III of the Bill.
PART V: MISCELLANEOUS AND SUPPLEMENTALMiscellaneousClause 53: New Commissioners 272. This Clause provides for the appointment of two judicial Commissioners to check on the use made of some of the powers in this Bill. 273. The Interception of Communications Commissioner will replace the Commissioner appointed under the Interception of Communications Act 1985. This is currently Lord Nolan. The Covert Investigations Commissioner will be a new post.
274. Subsection (2) details the remit of the Interception Commissioner. This will involve reviewing:
275. Subsection (3). The Covert Investigations Commissioner will report on the use of surveillance and covert human intelligence sources and of related decryption requests by public authorities other than:
276. Subsection (8) is a transitional provision allowing the existing Interception Commissioner to take office as the new Interception Commissioner on the coming into force of this section.
Clause 54: Cooperation with and reports by new Commissioners277. Subsection (1) requires that all those who may be involved in requesting, authorising, or carrying out, interception should cooperate with the Interception Commissioner as he reviews the operation of the regime.
278. Subsection (2) requires that all those who may be involved in requesting, authorising, carrying out or using the products of relevant surveillance or covert human intelligence sources should cooperate with the Covert Investigations Commissioner.
279. Subsection (4) provides that the Interception Commissioner should report to the Prime Minister if he believes that arrangements made by the Secretary of State are inadequate either for the protection of intercepted material or decryption keys.
Clause 55: Additional functions of other Commissioners280. This clause allocates oversight of certain powers in this Bill to the existing Security Service Commissioner, Intelligence Services Commissioner or Surveillance Commissioner as appropriate.
281. This means that for every intercepting agency, two Commissioners will oversee their use of the powers. The Interception Commissioner will look at their use of interception, the other relevant Commissioner will review their use of all other powers. All other public authorities will be overseen by one Commissioner only.
282. Subsection (1) adds to the existing remit of the Security Service Commissioner the function of reviewing:
283. Subsection (2) adds to the remit of the existing Intelligence Services Commissioner the function of reviewing the:
284. Subsection (3) adds to the existing remit of the Chief Surveillance Commissioner the functions of reviewing:
Clause 56: The Tribunal285. This Clause establishes a Tribunal, sets out its jurisdiction and supports Schedule 2 which provides for its constitution and functioning.
286. Subsections (2) to (5) set out the key elements of the Tribunal's jurisdiction. It is to be the appropriate forum for complaints or proceedings in relation to the following categories:
287. Subsection (6) limits those proceedings relating to the types of conduct listed which the Tribunal may hear only to that conduct which is by or on behalf of or in relation to any person belonging to any of the organisations in paragraphs (a) to (f).
288. Subsection (7) qualifies the second category of conduct which falls under the Tribunal's jurisdiction. Conduct should only fall within that category if it is conduct which took place with, or might reasonably have been considered necessary to take place only with, one of the types of authorisation listed in subsection (8).
Clause 57: Orders allocating proceedings to the Tribunal289. This Clause makes further provision concerning the orders (by affirmative resolution, see Clause 68) that the Secretary of State may make to provide for the Tribunal to exercise jurisdiction over certain types of case. It ensures that
Clause 58: Exercise of the Tribunal's jurisdiction290. This Clause makes further provision concerning the exercise of the Tribunal's jurisdiction under Clause 56. It describes how the Tribunal is to hear, consider and investigate complaints and proceedings, confers on the Tribunal the power to award compensation, quash or cancel any warrant or authorisation and require the destruction of records of information.
291. Subsection (6) confers powers on the Tribunal. An order to quash or cancel any warrant or authorisation would overturn the decision of the person who authorised such an instrument, and any continued conduct under the terms of the quashed authorisation or examination of information obtained under its authority would not be lawful.
Clause 59: Tribunal procedure292. This Clause provides for the Tribunal to determine their own procedure (subject to any rules made by the Secretary of State under Clause 60), and requires it to inform certain persons of proceedings, complaints and their determinations, and empowers it to require the cooperation of certain persons in exercising their powers and duties.
293. Subsection (2) empowers the Tribunal to require any Commissioner listed in subsection (8) to advise it on any matters falling within his knowledge which are relevant to the Tribunal's functions.
Clause 60: Tribunal rules294. This Clause describes those rules which the Secretary of State may make in Parliament (by affirmative resolution) to regulate the Tribunal's exercise of its powers, and any matters related to them.
295. Subsections (2) to (5) describe rules the Secretary of State may make, without limiting his power to make rules only to those matters listed.
296. Subsection (6) require the Secretary of State, in making any rules, to ensure that:
297. Subsection (7) enables any rules to incorporate, for example, Civil Procedure Rules which have already been made. This avoids the need to create such rules from scratch for the Tribunal where they already exist elsewhere.
Clause 61: Abolition of jurisdiction in relation to complaints298. This Clause repeals those provisions listed in subsection (2), which provide for the jurisdiction of Tribunals established by other Acts of Parliament to investigate complaints concerning conduct which is in future to be investigated by the Tribunal established in this Bill. Those Tribunals may, however, finish their investigation of those cases which they begin to consider before the Bill comes into force.
Clause 62: Issue and revision of Codes of Practice299. This clause deals with the issuing of Codes of Practice to explain in greater detail the practical arrangements relating to the use of the provisions of this Bill.
300. Subsections (1) and (2) require the Secretary of State to issue one or more Codes of Practice covering the powers and duties in this Bill and those relating to interference with property or wireless telegraphy in either the Intelligence Services Act 1994 or Part III of the Police Act 1997.
301. Subsections (3), (4) and (5) require the Secretary of State to consult on any Codes of Practice, lay the drafts before Parliament and bring them into force through an Order (by affirmative resolution, see Clause 68).
Clause 63: Effect of Codes of Practice302. Subsection (1) requires any person to take account of any applicable Code of Practice issued under Clause 62 while exercising or performing any power or duty under this Bill.
303. Subsection (2) explains that a failure to comply with a Code of Practice issued under Clause 62 will not of itself constitute a criminal offence or civil tort.
304. Subsection (3) allows the evidential use of a Code of Practice in court.
305. Subsection (4) requires that, where relevant, the statutory bodies described in this subsection must take into account the provisions of a Code of Practice.
Clause 64: Conduct in relation to Wireless Telegraphy306. This clause amends Section 5 of the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949 in order to ensure that the interception provisions of that Act comply with the Human Rights Act 1998.
307. Subsection (1) transfers the words of the existing section 5 of the Wireless Telegraphy Act to a new subsection 5(1). It also has the effect of removing the general authority to intercept wireless telegraphy which existed for persons acting in their duty as a servant of the Crown, and of changing the authority level which is required to authorise interception of wireless telegraphy from "under the authority of the Secretary of State" to "under the authority of a designated person".
308. Subsection (2) creates new subsections 5(2) to 5(11) to the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949 as follows:
Clause 65: Warrants under the Intelligence Services Act 1994309. This clause changes the test which must be satisfied before a warrant is issued under section 5 of the Intelligence Services Act 1994. Instead of "likely to be of substantial value", the test is now that the Secretary of State must be satisfied that:
310. Subsection (3) amends the urgent provisions so that a senior official of any department may sign an urgent warrant issued on the oral authority of the Secretary of State. Such a senior official will be a member of the Senior Civil Service.
Clause 66: Authorisations under Part III of the Police Act 1997311. This Clause makes amendments to Part III of the Police Act 1997.
312. Subsections (2) and (3) amend section 93 of the Police Act to allow a police authorising officer to authorise interference with property outside his force area solely for the purpose of maintenance or retrieval of equipment. This will allow a chief constable to authorise action to maintain or retrieve a tracking device from a vehicle that has travelled outside the force area, without having to seek authorisation from the chief constable into whose force area the vehicle has travelled. In addition it removes the restriction on where a customs officer may act.
313. In the same way that Clause 65 amends the Intelligence Services Act 1994, subsections (4) and (5) introduce the new tests in the Part III authorisation process. These again require that the action authorised must be necessary and proportionate to what it seeks to achieve and that the action could not reasonably be achieved by other means.
314. Subsection (5) provides for an authorising officer of the Royal Ulster Constabulary to authorise interference with property or wireless telegraphy where it is necessary in the interests of national security as well as for the prevention or detection of serious crime. This is required because of the particular responsibilities of the Chief Constable of the RUC in relation to counter-terrorism.
315. Subsections (6), (7) and (8) extend the provisions of part III to allow the chief constables of the British Transport Police and the Ministry of Defence Police and the Provost Marshals of the three service police forces to be authorising officers and to authorise interference with property or wireless telegraphy within their own jurisdictions. It also allows the Deputy Director General of the National Crime Squad to be an authorising officer in his own right and for the Commissioners of Customs & Excise to designate more than one customs officer to act as an authorising officer.
316. Subsection (7) makes an amendment to section 93(6) to provide that "relevant area" for the MOD police means the places described in section 2 of the Ministry of Defence Police Act 1987.
317. Subsection (8) makes provision about where the Service Police forces may exercise powers under the 1997 Act.
Clause 69: Criminal liability of directions etc318. This Clause provides for personal criminal liability on the part of certain individuals in companies and other bodies corporate.
Clause 70: General saving for lawful conduct319. Clause 70 ensures that nothing in this Bill makes any actions unlawful unless that is explicitly stated. The availability of an authorisation or a warrant does not mean that it is unlawful not to seek or obtain one. In this respect, the Bill must be read with section 6 of the Human Rights Act, which makes it unlawful to act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention right.
Schedule 1: Persons Having the Appropriate Permission320. Schedule 1 deals with the duration and types of appropriate permission which may empower a person to serve a written notice under Clause 46 of this Bill requiring disclosure of information. The authority required to grant such permission varies depending on the powers under which unintelligible information is or is likely to be obtained.
Paragraph 1: Requirement that appropriate permission is granted by a judge
321. This paragraph states that subject to the provisions of the paragraphs below, authority to serve a written notice must be given by a judge as described in Sub-paragraph (1).
322. The effect of Sub-paragraph (2) is that where a judge's permission has been obtained under this paragraph, no further authority is required to serve a written notice.
|
Paragraph 2: Data obtained under warrant etc323. This paragraph deals with unintelligible information which is or is likely to be obtained under a statutory power exercised in accordance with:
324. Sub-paragraph (2) states that the warrant or authorisation may empower a person to serve a notice requiring disclosure if
325. Sub-paragraphs (3) to (5) describe those persons who are capable of having the appropriate permission to serve a notice in relation to material to which this paragraph applies. And Sub-paragraphs (6) to (8) describe those persons who may issue a warrant or authorisation under Clause 46 in relation to such material.
326. The effect of this paragraph is that where, for example, protected material has been obtained under an interception warrant, the authorisation to serve a disclosure notice may be granted by the Secretary of State.
327. Sub-paragraph (9) excludes from this paragraph unintelligible information:
328. This might include, for example, cases where a constable has a right to enter premises under a warrant and while on the premises uncovers matter which he suspects to be evidence of a crime unrelated to the warrant itself, in accordance with e.g. section 19 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE).
Paragraph 3: Data obtained by the intelligence services under statute but without a warrant329. This paragraph deals with unintelligible information which is, or is likely to be, lawfully obtained by the intelligence services but not under a warrant. This might include, for example, material obtained under an authorisation given under Part II of this Bill.
330. Sub-paragraph (2) enables the Secretary of State to give authority for a notice to be served in such instances.
Paragraph 4: Data obtained under statute by other persons but without a warrant331. This paragraph deals with unintelligible information which is or is likely to be obtained by certain agencies (other than the intelligence services) under statutory powers but not under a warrant. This includes, for example, material obtained by the police under powers conferred by section 19 of PACE.
332. The effect of Sub-paragraph (2) is that senior officers of the police, customs and excise and armed forces (as described in Paragraph 6) may authorise the service of a written notice in relation to material to which this paragraph applies.
333. The effect of sub-paragraph (3) is that where material to which this paragraph applies is obtained by agencies other than those described in Sub-paragraph (2), authority to serve a written notice is to be given by a judge, provided that the stipulations set out in Sub-paragraph (4) are complied with.
Paragraph 5: Data obtained without the exercise of statutory powers334. This paragraph deals with unintelligible information which is or is likely to come into the possession of an intelligence service, the police or customs and excise by any other lawful means not involving the exercise of statutory powers (e.g. material which has been voluntarily handed over).
335. The effect of Sub-paragraph (2) is to enable the Secretary of State to give his permission to serve a notice in relation to material, obtained by an intelligence service, falling under this paragraph.
Paragraph 6: General requirements relating to the appropriate permission336. This paragraph makes some further stipulations about the categories of person who may be empowered to require disclosure. It also makes some stipulations about the permissions that may be given by members of the police, customs and excise and the armed forces.
337. Sub-paragraph (3) states that in the case of information which has come into the police's possession by means of powers to stop and search vehicles and pedestrians under the Terrorism Act 2000 or the Prevention of Terrorism Act 1989 (PTA), those able to authorise the serving of notice to disclose keys must be an officer of police of or above the rank specified in section 42 and section 13A of those Acts respectively.
Section 13A of the PTA, for example, specifies such ranks as:
Paragraph 7: Duration of permission338. This paragraph provides for the duration of the validity of authorisations to serve a notice and prevents the issue of a notice after the authorisation has expired. The Bill does not require that a limit must be placed on the duration of an authorisation.
Paragraph 8: Formalities for permissions granted by the Secretary of State339. This paragraph states that any permissions granted by the Secretary of State in accordance with Schedule 1 may only be granted:
Schedule 2: The Tribunal340. This Schedule provides for the constitution of the Tribunal established under Clause 55.
Paragraph 1: Membership of the Tribunal
341. This paragraph determines the membership of the Tribunal.
342. Sub-paragraph (1) ensures that members of the Tribunal may be drawn from the legal profession in all parts of the United Kingdom.
'Superior courts of Great Britain and Ireland' means and includes
As to Northern Ireland, Her Majesty's High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland and Her Majesty's Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland; and
343. Sub-paragraph (3) limits the term of office to five years. A member whose term of office expires is eligible for reappointment. Were he to serve a second time he would have to be re-appointed by further Letters Patent. There is no retirement age.
344. Sub-paragraph (4) provides the means whereby a member may resign.
Paragraph 2: President and Vice-President
345. This paragraph establishes the positions of President and Vice-President who will be members of the Tribunal.
Paragraph 3: Members of the Tribunal with special responsibilities
346. This paragraph requires the President of the Tribunal:
Paragraph 4: Salaries and expenses
347. This paragraph deals with the payments of the members of the Tribunal and of its expenses.
Paragraph 5: Officers
348. Sub-paragraph (1) provides for the appointment of officers of the Tribunal by the Secretary of State, after consultation with the Tribunal. The Secretary of State may not therefore proceed unilaterally to make appointments. The provision itself places no limitation on the number of officers and (subject to Treasury approval as numbers) allows flexibility over the numbers, grades and individuals.
349. Sub-paragraph (2) enables an officer who is so authorised by the Tribunal to obtain documents or information on the Tribunal's behalf.
Paragraph 6: Parliamentary disqualification
350. The parts of the Schedules referred to in this paragraph list the bodies whose members are disqualified from membership of the House of Commons and the Northern Ireland Assembly respectively. They include Tribunals and public Boards, Commissions and Councils. Members of this Tribunal (as people paid for adjudicating in a quasi-judicial capacity on the decisions of Ministers, and able to overturn those decisions) clearly fall within the category of those who are normally disqualified.
Schedule 3Paragraph 8: The Police Act 1997 (c.50)
351. This makes necessary consequential changes in the light of the amendments to Part III of the Police Act 1997. These take account of the extension of authorising powers to the Ministry of Defence Police, the British Transport Police, the Service Police, the three service police forces, the Deputy Director General of the National Crime Squad and additional designated customs officers.
352. Sub-paragraph (9) extends the functions of the Chief Surveillance Commissioner so that he reports annually to the Prime Minister and at any other time on any matters arising from his functions in relation to part III of the Police Act 1997 or Part II of this Bill.
353. Sub-paragraph (10) imposes a wide duty on those exercising functions under these provisions to disclose or provide the Chief Surveillance Commissioner with any documents or information he requires to enable him to carry out his functions. It also imposes a duty on every Commissioner to give the Tribunal established under clause 54 of this Bill all such assistance as may be required.
PUBLIC SECTOR FINANCIAL COST AND PUBLIC SECTOR MANPOWER EFFECTS354. Increases in public expenditure and public service manpower contingent in this Bill will be limited to those arising from the expanded remit of the existing Commissioners, the appointment of a new Covert Investigations Commissioner and the establishment of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. But these latter costs should be offset against the savings from removing the Interception Tribunal, Security Service Tribunal, Intelligence Services Tribunal and the complaints function of the Police Act Commissioners. Overall extra costs are estimated at £750,000.
REGULATORY APPRAISAL355. A complete appraisal of the Regulatory Impact of these proposals can be found at www.homeoffice.gov.uk/oicd/ripbill.htm.
COMMENCEMENT DATE356. Clause 73(2) provides that the provisions of this Bill will come into force as set out by the Secretary of State by order.
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS357. Section 19 of the Human Rights Act 1998 requires the Minister in charge of a Bill in either House of Parliament to make a statement, before Second Reading, about the compatibility of the provisions of the Bill with the Convention rights (as defined by section 1 of that Act). The Secretary of State for the Home Department has made the following statement:
"In my view the provisions of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Bill are compatible with the Convention Rights". |
© Parliamentary copyright 2000. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office on behalf on Parliament.